Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

I just paid slightly above SMR for 78 PSA 9 Molly

softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
I think its worth it, pull from my box a couple of days ago not even close to this card! First one I have seen listed since I started this set too.I'm happy image

ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

Comments

  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Congrats on your buy. I upgraded from PSA 8 to 9 a few months ago myself. Still hoping Tram gets into the HOF too, making a truly unique rookie card. Nobody else I can think of on the multi-player rookie cards in the '60s and '70s has a chance in hell.
  • AllenAllen Posts: 7,165 ✭✭✭
    if only 67 and 68 had put both Seaver and Ryan together on one card lol.
  • OnlypsahockeyOnlypsahockey Posts: 1,479 ✭✭
    EDIT: NM read it wrong
    57 Topps (83%) 7.61
    61 Topps (100%) 7.96
    62 Parkhurst (100%) 8.70
    63 Topps (100%) 7.96
    63 York WB's (50%) 8.52
    68 Topps (39%) 8.54
    69 Topps (3%) 9.00
    69 OPC (83%) 8.21
    71 Topps (100%) 9.21 #1 A.T.F.
    72 Topps (100%) 9.39
    73 Topps (13%) 9.35
    74 OPC WHA (95%) 8.57
    75 Topps (50%) 9.23
    77 OPC WHA (86%) 8.62 #1 A.T.F.
    88 Topps (5%) 10.00
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    jrdolan ...Great point. My father grew up in Michigan as a life long tiger fan. He believes Trammel ia a HOF. Of course he thinks Whitaker is too! image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dan
    How about a pic? Let's see what it looks like!

    your friend
    Mike

    edit: image

    Great looking card!!!!!!!!!!
    Mike
  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭


    << <i>aren't fisk & ryan on multi-player rookie cards?


    Bob >>



    fisk and cecil cooper share a rookie card.. a pretty good combo..

    ·p_A·
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Mike, you beat me to it ! I couldn't pass it up. Just couldn't image

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • ajwajw Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭
    As an unbiased (read: not a Tiger fan) I firmly believe that Trammell and Whitaker both deserve strong, strong consideration for the Hall. That Whitaker dropped off the ballot after one year is a travesty. I think they're both hurt by the huge numbers being put up by today's middle infielders.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Sure Tram will get in. Any hope for Mickey Klutts? (With a name like that, he probably wasn't a slick fielder)

    Up above, I meant anyone else from a multi card with a HOFer already on it. Oops.
  • CDsNutsCDsNuts Posts: 10,092 ✭
    Sadly, I don't think Trammell will get in. He was too closely tied to Sweet Lou; you couldn't mention one without the other. I think they should go in as a combo, but that will never happen. I was upset when Whitaker was hardly given any consideration, but I feel the same way about Dawson, Gossage, Maris, and Dave Stewart (talk about a guy you didn't want to face in the early-late 1980s). We're getting to the point where pitchers need to break records or play for over 20 years, and hitters need to load up on HRs and RBIs. For example, 15 years ago, Barry Larkin gets in; now, no way. The game has changed and unfortunately the voters are changing with it.


    ps- Anybody remember the Magnum P.I. where Trammell and Whitaker meet Magnum in a bar and give him tickets to a game? Classic.


    Lee

Sign In or Register to comment.