Think this Wisconsin quarter error is having no effect on the hobby?
RYK
Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
I thought so until I received this email through my website:
I saw your posting on Collectors Universe regarding the purchase of the
Wisconsin Quarters by Dave Bowers. When I was much younger I had a fiery
passion for coin collecting and the recent news on the Wisconsin quarter has
re-lit that fire.
I saw your posting on Collectors Universe regarding the purchase of the
Wisconsin Quarters by Dave Bowers. When I was much younger I had a fiery
passion for coin collecting and the recent news on the Wisconsin quarter has
re-lit that fire.
0
Comments
I hope it brings a bunch of new collectors! Especially to error coins
Cameron Kiefer
Sure, die gouges are common, but most are uninteresting, and don't look like anything in particular beyond just damage. This one, though, LOOKS like something. And not only that, we have all the intrigue and mystery of TWO versions of the thing, both plausibly (if roughly) leaves!
I don't understand the cynicism the issue has been greeted with here.
If you can't get enthused about something like this, what gets you excited about coin collecting?
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
<< <i>I don't understand the cynicism the issue has been greeted with here.
If you can't get enthused about something like this, what gets you excited about coin collecting? >>
<< <i>This is a fascinating, thoroughly cool once-in-a generation phenomenon, like the three-legged Buff. It may turn out to be common, but cool it remains!
Sure, die gouges are common, but most are uninteresting, and don't look like anything in particular beyond just damage. This one, though, LOOKS like something. And not only that, we have all the intrigue and mystery of TWO versions of the thing, both plausibly (if roughly) leaves!
I don't understand the cynicism the issue has been greeted with here.
If you can't get enthused about something like this, what gets you excited about coin collecting? >>
My sentiments, exactly! well said, sir!
blue skies!
david
-Bochiman
If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving definitely isn't for you.
-unknown
Another common date MS-63 Morgan?
<< <i>I don't understand the cynicism the issue has been greeted with here. >>
It's a modern, what'd you expect?
Russ, NCNE
Yesterday, I was in my bank. Just for fun (not expecting a 'yes' at all), I walked up to the teller and asked (a) if she had any mint-wrapped quarter rolls, and (b) if so, were they the Wisconsin quarter. At first she did not understand the question, so she looked to the adjacent teller, who was helping another customer. A conversation ensued. The adjacent teller said that they did have quarter mint rolls. I asked if any were WI 'D' mint. She said no. She'd already checked. At which point, her customer chimed in and remarked she'd heard that one went for $600 recently. I said I'd heard about an $800-plus sale on e-bay [on this board]. Maybe I'm fueling the hype , but it is remarkable that this entire conversation happened -- in central Illinois -- far from the scene of the action.
(Incidentally, my bank has sold me the odd mint-wrapped roll from time to time. Back in 2000, I bought a mint-wrapped roll of SAC dollars after a conversation with a teller who said that he'd opened several and noted that they were odd colors "all the way through the roll". I am saving that roll unopened to see what happens to the coins in like twenty years or something.)
Hey Russ, you're the expert in that field. Maybe you should teach an adult-ed class at the local community college on how to make a quick buck with coins...
42/92
Probably both. This guy seems to want to get back to collecting coins of the kind he did as a child. Then, of course, there is the beanie baby crowd, who will buy and sell anything if they can turn a back on it.
...again
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
Meanwhile, this is the only error Wisconsin that is available in circulation here.....
Paul
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't understand the cynicism the issue has been greeted with here.
If you can't get enthused about something like this, what gets you excited about coin collecting? >>
>>
Yes, but, 5 out of 5 error experts agree, it's a die gouge until they say otherwise. Because, since they know from past history that the mint will sit back silently and watch, they can create a cottage industry of commentary/speculation and own the issue because they will be the ones quoted in CoinWorld or other places. They may actually have common sense (yet to be proven) and know its a design variation, but that ends ceaseless debate and does not serve their purpose. So a die gouge it is, they proclaim.
What is different this time? In my opinion, the internet. This time, dissemination of information is instantaneous and from an unlimited number of sources. They don't own this one. Since everyone can see the variation even though at this point relatively few have one, their guess is worth the same as everyone elses, and that they don't like, hence the cynicism and pooh-poohing.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Russ, NCNE
Camelot
It's a lucky break (or should I say gouge) for them but I doubt anyone at the Mint planned this little "conspiracy". But we'll never know for sure, will we?
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>Yeah, its creating gullable idiots. That would be the dolts stupid enough to pay more than $100 for either of these errors >>
This coming from smoeone who has a Franklin as their icon!
I explained what to look for and how to find it. Of course, I also had to tell them that there were lots
of other rarities in circulation they'd be hearing more about in the future.