I did not intend to question the character of the seller. I am appalled that a coin of this condition could even rate MS. I’ve seen a lot of nice looking coins grade AU for having the slightest hint of rubbing.
My reference to a joke was whether the PCGS would rate such a coin as MS. I doubt that it left the mint in that condition.
Thanks for linking up to the last thread HTubbs...I missed that one.
<< <i>I doubt that it left the mint in that condition. >>
OBW all the way...the quality on this date is horrid....PCGS has NEVER graded a 1958 Jefferson better than MS65/MS65FS. I had pulled a stack of FS coins from a number of original rolls that I bought last summer on the way back from the ANA and I had sorted them into a "rejects" stack and a "possible MS64FS or better" stack, and then I sorted the "keeper" coins by condition. Next thing that happened is I think I grabbed a reject to tie up this submission when I meant to grab the nicest keeper coin instead. What really scares me is the fact that this got the same numeric grade as this coin, different submission but graded the same week.
<< <i>Lastly: We're ALWAYS interested in helping you dispose of your undergrades. >>
I don't think I would ever be so brutal in writing up a consigned coin...of course I've never had a coin on consignment that deserved the verbal smackdown that this "home grown" wonder received.
RELLA
Do not fall into the error of the artisan who boasts of twenty years experience in his craft while in fact he has had only one year of experience... twenty times.
Comments
Some buyers like to collect the low grades too I guess.
collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
Oh, and
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>WARNING ...Coin Pictured Is The One You'll Receive. >>
And this:
<< <i>Lastly: We're ALWAYS interested in helping you dispose of your undergrades. >>
Not really an understatement.
Are you a joke for asking?
The seller is so blunt with his assement.
I admire that.
RR
<< <i>No, it's no joke.
Are you a joke for asking?
The seller is so blunt with his assement.
I admire that.
RR >>
A little harsh don't ya' think? It's his first post.
BTW......
My reference to a joke was whether the PCGS would rate such a coin as MS. I doubt that it left the mint in that condition.
I love that statement from the seller!!
Thanks for linking up to the last thread HTubbs...I missed that one.
<< <i>I doubt that it left the mint in that condition. >>
OBW all the way...the quality on this date is horrid....PCGS has NEVER graded a 1958 Jefferson better than MS65/MS65FS. I had pulled a stack of FS coins from a number of original rolls that I bought last summer on the way back from the ANA and I had sorted them into a "rejects" stack and a "possible MS64FS or better" stack, and then I sorted the "keeper" coins by condition. Next thing that happened is I think I grabbed a reject to tie up this submission when I meant to grab the nicest keeper coin instead. What really scares me is the fact that this got the same numeric grade as this coin, different submission but graded the same week.
<< <i>Lastly: We're ALWAYS interested in helping you dispose of your undergrades. >>
I don't think I would ever be so brutal in writing up a consigned coin...of course I've never had a coin on consignment that deserved the verbal smackdown that this "home grown" wonder received.
RELLA
who boasts of twenty years experience in his craft
while in fact he has had only one year of experience...
twenty times.