Got the 1884 S Morgan, grade opinions? (Big Pics!)

RVDavis

OK so I got the 1884 S Morgan I posted about over the weekend. Opinions?

Sorry about the picture size, my first time using outside hosted pictures I will work on the technique. I do not know why the colors shifted too bad that's not tone. Grin.

Rick

fountainheadgold

Wow big pic, AU

gemini12398

au53

morgannut2

Picture is too big for me to tell.

RVDavis

getting there. pictures still too big?

DennisH

AU55

CoinOnTheCob

My scanner was doing something like that for a while. It turned half the image yellow.

RVDavis

I figured it out, I was using ASCII mode in FTP. Once I went to binary it came out fine.

zenny

au54

jcping

AU53. On a lucky day, PCGS could give you AU55. On a bad hair day, PCGS will assign AU50 to it, IMHO.

Betta285

AU55
jim

rkfish

55

morgannut2

IMHO, it's a good shot at AU-55 if it's lusterous and bright certainly worth holdering as it's a key date now bring $300-$500 at that grade. Even in AU-53, it's valuable enough to certify, and is better than most.

techeff

I'll say 45.

jdsinva

Looks to be a solid AU and what looks to be like a small strike through near the 4th right star.

Steve27

AU55

BigGreek

I don't think it would grade at PCGS because it looks cleaned.
I would grade it as an AU-53.

ziggy29

If it's original and still has a decent amount of luster, probably AU-53, *maybe* a shot at 55.

dorkkarl

i think that coin's been "worked on", but would still slab, xf-45, w/ an excellent shot at au-50

K S

RVDavis

I do not see evidence of whizzing; and there is full cartwheel. Has it been dipped? Who the hecks knows; not by me but that's as far as I can verify. I have a couple of slabs that I keep around that are cleaned coins for reference; this coin looks pretty original to me.

Thanks to all for the opinions.

Rick