Could coins be graded by metal flow?
MrEureka
Posts: 24,253 ✭✭✭✭✭
The surface of every struck coin exhibits metal flow over 100% of its surfaces. Under a microscope, it should be easy to detect disruptions in the metal flow caused my wear, scratches, dipping, etc. It shouldn't be all that complicated to analyze the surfaces of a coin and calculate an OBJECTIVE grade.
It's obvious to me that this will be done sooner or later. The question is, why hasn't it been done already?
It's obvious to me that this will be done sooner or later. The question is, why hasn't it been done already?
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
Too time consuming? I believe there has been past experiments with computer grading.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
strength of strike and how it relates to the series/date.
quality of the dies and planchets plays a good part of it too.
and what level of die state should play a part in the grading of a coin?
can a late die state coin grade better than 64?
or a slightly weak strike always be a 64 at best?
grading is tough when you have so many variables
to be aware of.
nearly any coin can be talked up or down in grade points
with seemimgly logical reasoning either one way or the other.
its almost never cut and dry.
cant forget that demon.
1. 7-17-81 Warrenton GC Driver 310 yards 7th Hole (Par 4)
2. 5-22-99 Warrenton GC 6 iron 189 yards 10th Hole
3. 7-23-99 Oak Meadow CC 5 iron 180 yards 17th Hole
4. 9-19-99 Country Lake GC 6 iron 164 yards 15th Hole
5. 8-30-09 Country Lake GC Driver 258 yards 17th Hole (Par 4)
Collector of Barber Halves, Commems, MS64FBL Frankies, Full Step Jeffersons & Mint state Washington Quarters
not sure they play with it anymore,or will admit to using it.
maybe when they get tired of grading statehood quarters
all day they fire that program up and go drink a beer while they count
their monies.
So a darkly toned, ugly, bagmarked coin with edge dings but intact flow lines would be a gem?? The flow lines would be a component of originality but not a overriding issue.
No. Dark toning and edge dings damage metal flow.
As for strike, eye appeal, cameo, die state, etc, all of those things can be easily assessed from an image. I don't see much benefit in assigning a numeric value to those subjective aspects to a coin. Better to quantify the things that cannot be seen as easily in an image and let people figure the rest out for themselves. Of course, that would not preclude a TPG from offering an objective technical grade based on metal flow analysis AND a separate opinion as to a subjective grade. Let the market sort it out.
I find it interesting to consider how various forms of coin doctoring might be interpreted by a computer that analyzes metal flow, since doctoring often damages (and sometimes completely obliterates) metal flow.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Agreed with the above. Except that with strike and cameo/deep cameo the use of them as an adjective only splintered the grades with adjectives such as FBL, FB, FH, DCAM, CAM, DMPL, PL, etc. which created greater complexity in the numerical grade charts.
<<<<<<<<No. Dark toning and edge dings damage metal flow. >>>>>>>>
Problem is (1) NGC slabs do not always reveal edge dings, (2) when does medium pleasant toning become dark toning? Becomes a bit subjective as well? (3) Edge dings are often not in the midst of metal flow lines.