Coin Values Magazine...Franklin Prices wrong?
MadMonk
Posts: 3,743 ✭
I took my first look at "Coin Values" Magazine this past weekend. I think they had some printing errors there. 65's worth more than 66's. Non FBL's worth more than FBL's. Any regular readers here? Do they have those problems frequently?
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
0
Comments
PURPLE
****** edit
Sorry, I read your post wrong. Now that I look at it, that is odd. Hmmmmmmm maybe More common in 65 FBL then in a 66 non-FBL? That almost doesn't sound right.
P.S. I'm looking at the Jan 3 '05, issue
Just out of curiosity, I wonder what the pop report reads on the 48-D in a 65 FBL and a 66 -non FBL
Chris
65 FBL - 770/77/0
66 - 2/0
That explains the price jump!
Chris
<< <i>I know that Mark is working hard on making Trends a realistic guide to current coin prices. If you e-mail him your concerns or find errors, I'm sure he will fix them. >>
Mark F. Arnett?
The last issue I have is Novembers and it was still listed the same.....maybe I'll do that
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
<< <i>Has anyone noticed that since Coin Values went to the magazine format the price changes on coins, especially Lincoln cents, have been much less frequent. >>
I think he has been working on getting the Seated and Early Series up to date????