I GOT GRADES!!!! With images to go with the dry numbers!

Russ

Economy submission.

LINE # CERT # COIN DATE DENOMINATION VARIETY COUNTRY GRADE

1 21816502 1887 S$1 USA MS63
2 21816503 1888 S$1 USA MS63
3 21816504 1962 50C USA PR66CA
4 21816505 1962 50C USA PR66CA
5 21816506 1962 50C USA PR67CA
6 21816507 1964 50C USA PR64
7 21816508 1964 50C Accented Hair USA PR68

Date Received: 11/30/2004
Date Shipped: No Date Specified

I had the 1887 Morgan going MS64, so I was a point high. I had the 1888 grading MS61, so that's a rather pleasant surprise.

I had all the Frankies at PR67CAM, so not too bad on those.

I really didn't know what PCGS would grade the regular proof Kennedy - I was just hoping they would!

Nailed the Accented Hair at PR68.

Some of the coins:









They got this done pretty quick for economy.

Russ, NCNE

100proof1957

Sure !

You get your stuff 2 weeks b4 me and i get jobbed as well !

LucyBop

K6AZ

Wasn't that 1887 the subject of a thread you posted about whether it was NT or AT? Can you pull up a link to that thread?

Russ

http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=26&threadid=340456

Russ, NCNE

K6AZ

Ah yes, I knew there was a good reason I remembered that thread

MadMarty

Oh that is too funny!!! I love it!!!

TUMUSS

meos1

You have to respect Russ. He posts he assigned grade and the grade received from the TPG. And hes +/- 1 grader if not dead on. He knows his series.

Russ

<< <i>And hes +/- 1 grader if not dead on. >>



Not always. I took it in the shorts on the submission before this one.

Russ, NCNE

zkcoins

You are correct about him posting all comments. You have to respect that, wish more people did.
Zach

relayer

That 1888 is a very pretty coin. You'd probably get a * at NGC

Russ

<< <i>That 1888 is a very pretty coin. >>



Several other people have said that. It's funny, but I actually like the 1887 better.

Russ, NCNE

K6AZ

Tumuss, I beg of you, please get rid of the sig picture.

DHeath

Nice invoice. Those are pretty coins.

Sandhawk

Tumuss, I beg of you, please get rid of the sig picture

That just ain't right !!!

jonesy

What's wrong with TUMMUS's pic??

K6AZ

<< <i>What's wrong with TUMMUS's pic?? >>



Sorry, I'm not into hefers cooling their drinks in their bosoms.

BigGreek

<< <i>

<< <i>What's wrong with TUMMUS's pic?? >>



Sorry, I'm not into hefers cooling their drinks in their bosoms. >>



With all due respect I believe it is the bosoms that are being cooled.
The BK crown says alot, thought.

EvilMCT

<< <i>You are correct about him posting all comments. You have to respect that, wish more people did. >>



Agreed. It would also be nice to see more people stand by their statements and not delete them when things get heated.

Nice coins (as usual) Russ.

Ken

Wolf359

Very pretty coins, hopefully you'll flip the Morgans for a monster profit. That Franklin looks just a hair from DCAM. Did you consider NCS? They did a great job with mine, even though NGC managed to leave CAMEO off the slab...

DennisH

Shoot!

Your Economy submissions was received 11/30/04 and you've already got results.

I'm still waiting on an Economy submission they received on 11/23/04... and another on 11/29/03.

Russ

<< <i>That Franklin looks just a hair from DCAM. Did you consider NCS? >>



All three of the Frankies are pretty strong; well above baseline for cameo, but not DCAMs. Nothing about them that was NCS improvable, so they didn't make a trip in that direction. Had another from the same group that I did send and then on to NGC.

Russ

morgannut2

You're right, the 1887 Morgan is a prettier coin plus it looks MS-64 to me.