Home U.S. Coin Forum

Multipart Question

This coin here seems to be a cameo, doesn't it? I gotta ask; do you agree with his grade? Also, I know you'll all cringe at this question, but don't watery proofs dip nicely? I know alot of MS coins when dipped can show a dull grey luster, and then be rejected by PCGS, but I tried dipping common date DCAM Kennedy's, and they come out perfect. Do you think the same would result in this coin, and be gradeable by PCGS?

Comments

  • It might be cameo, though to me, it just looks like the fields are dirty and the devices have been cleaned! Of course, it's hard to tell from the pic, but I always ask myself, "If it's so nice, why not spend the $30 to get it authenticated, graded, and slabbed?"

    I'd stay away.........

    Mike
    Coppernicus

    Lincoln Wheats (1909 - 1958) Basic Set - Always Interested in Upgrading!
  • johnny50johnny50 Posts: 101 ✭✭
    What makes you think that the devices are cleaned?
  • johnny50johnny50 Posts: 101 ✭✭
    Look at the reverse shield; where are the vertical lines?
  • Well, on both the obverse and reverse, the lettering is dark/toned but the head (obverse) and the eagle (reverse) are bright. This may just be the picture/scan but I'm suspicious. On the reverse, why are the stars and ribbon so bright but the "D States of Ame" dark? Is this what you'd expect?

    Mike
    Coppernicus

    Lincoln Wheats (1909 - 1958) Basic Set - Always Interested in Upgrading!
  • i'm with coppernicus

    the devices look to be cleaned, though it could jsut be the picture
    I would be wary of this coin.

    if the devices are so bright, why isn't the rest of the coin???

    Jeff
    I collect bits and pieces of everything
    or should I say I ACCUMULATE!
    I also dabble with the darkside image

    Ive recently gotten more into currency, especially modern star notes
  • If it were album-toned the central devices might look like that. However, what struck me were the wing tips. They're right next to the letters but much, much brighter. Something is going on here, whether with the coin or the photography.

    I agree. It doesn't look right to me, either.
    The strangest things seem suddenly routine.
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    I think this coin would end up with a paste-white finish if dipped, and thus would be body-bagged PCGS.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • I think the perpherial areas a not as bright because of moderately heavy toning. There appears to be an old fngerprint behind the head and a little chatter in the field in front of the eyes. I suspect that if the coin was dipped the fields would show some hairlining and the fields would be dulled because of the heavy toning. I would not dip this coin, especially if it has any eye appeal in person at all because I think it would have less after the dip.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file