The Charles II Sixpence Collection
![Sylvestius](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/defaulticon/pdefault.gif)
I've yet to update my page dedicated to this set on the coinpeople forum.
But i'll stick a version of it here simply for those interested, plus i always like to get people interested in sixpences.![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif)
They were minted from 1674-1684 inclusive, with overdates in several of those years, some dates are only known as overdates.
A full set consists of; 1674, 1675/4, 1675, 1676/5, 1676/5 (with a large 6 over a small 6), 1677, 1678/7, 1679, 1680, 1681, 1682/1, 1682, 1683 and 1684.
They key dates are 1680 and 1682 non-overdate variant.
I have;
1674
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896260.jpg)
1675
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896262.jpg)
1675/4
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896261.jpg)
1676/5 large 6/small 6
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896263.jpg)
1680 (the key date) A cheap filler piece.
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896264.jpg)
and 1683
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896246.jpg)
Of those 1674 is my fave and the 1676/5 is my least fave (the best grading and semi-key) but i don't like the tone much.
But i'll stick a version of it here simply for those interested, plus i always like to get people interested in sixpences.
![image](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif)
They were minted from 1674-1684 inclusive, with overdates in several of those years, some dates are only known as overdates.
A full set consists of; 1674, 1675/4, 1675, 1676/5, 1676/5 (with a large 6 over a small 6), 1677, 1678/7, 1679, 1680, 1681, 1682/1, 1682, 1683 and 1684.
They key dates are 1680 and 1682 non-overdate variant.
I have;
1674
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896260.jpg)
1675
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896262.jpg)
1675/4
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896261.jpg)
1676/5 large 6/small 6
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896263.jpg)
1680 (the key date) A cheap filler piece.
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896264.jpg)
and 1683
![image](http://www.omnicoin.com/coins/896246.jpg)
Of those 1674 is my fave and the 1676/5 is my least fave (the best grading and semi-key) but i don't like the tone much.
0
Comments
FOR SALE Items
My OmniCoin Collection
My BankNoteBank Collection
Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
I love the way the 1674 and 1675 (non overdate) actually compliment each other, i think the 1683 works well with those two also.
Edit to my original post at the top, the large6/small 6 phenomenon actually occurs on the 1675 issue, not the 1676.
I have a full William and Mary Set also.
If i can get the full Charles set, then i can move onto James II and get all those. Hopefully then i'll have Charles II, James II and William and Mary completed 1674-1694.
Then it's George II's turn, which'll make a full date run through 1728-1758, plus both Geo III early milled variants. If i still have enough steam after that lot then i'll turn my attention to Anne and Geo I. Leaving William III till last.
My OmniCoin Collection
My BankNoteBank Collection
Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Collecting Penguins, Named Ship Coins and other assorted goodies
Looking for Circulated coins of Papua New Guinea
stores.ebay.com/Grumpy's-Cave
Blaze - Yellow male b 3/17/93
Onyx - Black male b 3/7/99
Duchess - Yellow female mix b 3/12/02 rescued 9/18/02
Rifle - Yellow male mix b 12/1/02 rescued 8/8/03
Diamond - Black female b 5/3/05 adopted 8/3/05
First Cam-slam - 9/21/04
My eBay
<< <i>A great set. I find it really scary that someone out there actually has "a plan".
Very nice Sylvestius!
<< <i>A great set. I find it really scary that someone out there actually has "a plan".
I always have a plan!
I just like to know where i'm going, of course i don't always stick to this plan. The weirdest thing about this is that over the last three years i've been constantly moving the objectives in this series, should i do a 1674-84 set, a 1674-94 set? A Geo II set... no matter what i do, it all amounts to the same thing, a full date run (including overdates) 1674-1787, which is hopefully what i'll end up with one day.
The one big obstacle is William III, the coins of that reign are a nightmare, i like the design of that issue but in the small period of 1695-1701, what could happen in 6 years? Well a massive recoinage, three obverses, three reverses and a fair few provincial mints. I could quarter the work load by focusing just on the London mint and omitting errors, which is what i've always intended to do, but it's still gonna be tough.
09/07/2006
Come on over ... to The Dark Side!