There is no way the card is NM-MT. Same logic applies when buying raw inventory from dealers that sell primarily graded inventory - you are most likely buying the leftovers. If you are okay with that - you can probably get some acceptable raw cards for your raw sets, nothing more.
The card is definitely trimmed. Bottom right corner underneath 2nd base. You can see it from the back view as well. From the back, you see the fuzz starts to disappear or loop in right at that exact spot. The right edge also looks wavy to me IMO.
<< <i>The card is definitely trimmed. Bottom right corner underneath 2nd base. You can see it from the back view as well. From the back, you see the fuzz starts to disappear or loop in right at that exact spot. The right edge also looks wavy to me IMO. >>
I was bidding on that Palmer PSA 9 too. Did you check it over or are you afraid to?
"My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. Our childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When we were insolent we were placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds - pretty standard really."
That's a really nice PSA 6. Must be a surface crease somewhere. Looks like a solid 9 and the centering is a lot better than the raw one. I'm sure the raw one was probably rejected somewhere down the line. Maybe it was in a PRO holder prior to its nakedness.
Comments
Bottom right corner underneath 2nd base.
You can see it from the back view as well.
From the back, you see the fuzz starts to disappear or loop in
right at that exact spot. The right edge also looks wavy
to me IMO.
<< <i>The card is definitely trimmed.
Bottom right corner underneath 2nd base.
You can see it from the back view as well.
From the back, you see the fuzz starts to disappear or loop in
right at that exact spot. The right edge also looks wavy
to me IMO. >>
B-I-N-G-O
......and bingo was his name-O!
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
PSA6
Wonder which will end up higher? (Betcha the raw card will - and someone will be disappointed).
Funny you mentioned the lower right corner being trimmed - it's the first thing I noticed as well.
your friend
Mike
Must be a surface crease somewhere.
Looks like a solid 9 and the centering
is a lot better than the raw one. I'm sure the
raw one was probably rejected somewhere
down the line. Maybe it was in a PRO holder
prior to its nakedness.
<< <i>I was bidding on that Palmer PSA 9 too. Did you check it over or are you afraid to? >>
i didnt like the psa 9 before and i like it less now
but i didnt examine it closely.i needed a 10 hundred dollar
holder.