Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

DISAPPOINTMENT: Oklahoma Sooners

Lothar52Lothar52 Posts: 2,664 ✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
WHAT THE HECK HAPPENED???????????????????

Comments

  • easttexascardsandgameseasttexascardsandgames Posts: 550
    I don't know, but I am just sich about it.. It was no real secret Oklahoma does not play great D, but tonight showed they don't play much O either
    image
  • mudflap02mudflap02 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭
    They pulled the same trick we did in the Cotton Bowl.

    image
  • fsjeterfsjeter Posts: 1,390
    I think I would have liked to have seen USC play Utah or Auburn. It might have been a better game. Three beers for the BCS!
    imageimageimage

    Scott
    Registry Sets:
    T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
    1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
    1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
    1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
    1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
    1981 Topps FB PSA 10
    1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
    1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
    3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up

    My Sets
  • yawie99yawie99 Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭
    Here's a little know fact: USC really is that good.
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
  • ctsoxfanctsoxfan Posts: 6,246 ✭✭
    The BCS basically - stinks. Who wouldn't rather have a playoff system instead of these archaic bowls?
    image
  • 5thScaleRacer5thScaleRacer Posts: 114 ✭


    << <i>The BCS basically - stinks. Who wouldn't rather have a playoff system instead of these archaic bowls? >>




    Who? Who?

    Athletic Directors who realize that these bowls gaurantee them more money compared to a playoff system...that's who.
  • mudflap02mudflap02 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭
    Actually, its more on the shoulders of university presidents than ADs.

    That being said, I think that a playoff system could be had, keeping the money for the schools and the bowls if they somehow used the bowls as the format for a playoff.
Sign In or Register to comment.