I need some help please
Wasy
Posts: 150
Can someone tell me why I see autographed cards that are slabbed by PSA/DNA and cards that are not but have an LOA from PSA? I feel so much more comfortable buying that slabbed card and I'm always wondering if someone has messed with the ones with the LOA. Why not slab them all?
0
Comments
Below are PSA/DNA cards of both types. The non-slabbed one has a permanent sticker with serial # placed directly on the card. I would be very wary of an autograph that has merely a generic "lot" LOA but no specific serial number for that auto. Who knows what's been mixed and matched in that lot, or how many hands that piece of paper has passed through, since PSA/DNA was involved?
I have several generic "the accompanying autograph is genuine" LOAs that arrived with things I have bought from reputable dealers. But now the LOA's are in my hands and since they don't describe a specific item, I can do anything I want with them. I could forge Babe Ruth's signature (assuming I could) and send along one of these pieces of paper. Not that anybody with half a brain would buy a Ruth auto without scads of proof, but you see my point. LOA's and COA's are worthless in my mind, f they don't describe the specific item or have matching serial numbers.
Agreed coa's and loa's are worthless 99% of the time, I was just curious as to why PSA isn't consistent regarding the slab and loa.
I assume that the psa sticker that is applied directly to the card is tamper proof?
I'm not interested in the card in the attached listing but what is your take on it? It has no psa/dna sticker on the back.
Link
Scott
T-205 Gold PSA 4 & up
1967 Topps BB PSA 8 & up
1975 Topps BB PSA 9 & up
1959 Topps FB PSA 8 & up
1976 Topps FB PSA 9 & up
1981 Topps FB PSA 10
1976-77 Topps BK PSA 9 & up
1988-89 Fleer BK PSA 10
3,000 Hit Club RC PSA 5 & Up
My Sets
Alan