Master Set question

NickM

Would you include cards which clearly and specifically picture a player but do not give his name on the card?

The classic example here is 1967, 1968, or 1969 Topps baseball checklists, which have a head shot picture of one player (normally a HOFer) but do not give his name.

The same also holds true for Playoff and World Series cards which clearly show a player (with or without his name being mentioned in the text on the card's front).

Rather than this being purely ad hoc for a particular player's set, I think clear guidelines should be established by PSA.

Nick

jrdolan

So this would be eligible for the Thurman Munson registry? This is an easy one, but what about team cards ... or cards where your favorite player is one of a group but all you see is the back of his head and a uniform number? Probably many gray areas where PSA would have to make a case-by-case decision, and for that reason they'd probably decline to implement such a change. I like the "clearly and specifically" part.

jimtb

Take it one step furthur, why not team photo cards?

NickM

How about this?

Nick