Home PCGS Set Registry Forum
Options

Are FS 1953-S Nickels over rated?

Here is an example of one of the MS64FS coins on the Heritage Web site 1953 S PCGS MS64FS.

If you view the closeup of the reverse, the strike is horrible (but it has steps). I have a MS64 example with 10 times the detail on the reverse that I paid a dollar for (but does not have full steps).

How much should the steps over ride the rest of the Monticello?
Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053

Comments

  • Options
    FullStepJeffsFullStepJeffs Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    I can't wait to hear this one... subscribe to this thread...
    U.S. Air Force Security Forces Retired

    In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I collect Jeffersons. I specifically don't collect FS Jeffersons. This '53-S is a poster child example of why.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    ...six steps are unverified...

    Bwa Ha Ha Ha Ha....................


    NICKEL TRIUMPH...NO STEPS
    NICKEL TRIUMPH...
  • Options
    dbledie55.

    Yea, I agree the weak strikes are a bit of an eyesore.
    PCGS is currently giving a two point bonus for the full step
    over the non fullstep. Which I think is about right.
    Which leaves the collector with a reasonable choice.

    The fully struck fullstep 53-S does not exist, or is very very
    close to nonexistant.

    Regards, Steve.
  • Options
    Geez!! That is one poor strike!! Is it really a 64?? image
  • Options
    FullStepJeffsFullStepJeffs Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    Okay, here is another one... does it look like a 63?

    1953-S ANACS MS63 5FS

    The real question is... with all of the pop guides added together, how many of these coins are there in full steps?

    I'll do some math... but, I don't have access to an ANACS pop report if one exists...

    Current pop reports say there are potentially 13 MS64FS and 1 MS65FS coins in PCGS holders.

    NGC says... awe well, so much for that idea... the NGC census is down...

    Somebody check it out will ya?

    Steve

    U.S. Air Force Security Forces Retired

    In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
  • Options
    The 53S is certainly one of the most difficult in a full strike and full steps. I have not seen a 53S with a full strike and full steps.

    In my opinion the ultimate Jefferson has a full strike and full steps.

    The 53S in my collection is perhaps the worst coin in my collection. It has full steps with a weak strike. I consider this a placeholder until a better coin can be found. I do not consider this a MS64 due to the weak strike. The third party grading companies need to be more conservative in grading weakly struck coins.

    I also believe giving a two point bonus for full step coins is justified.

    Frank
    (The Corso Collection) Always looking for high quality proof and full step Jeffersons - email me with details

    My Jefferson Full Step Variety Set (1938 - Current)

    My Jefferson Proof Variety Set (1938 - Current)
  • Options
    GACK!!!

    image
  • Options
    This gets to the broader issue of how much does "strike" play into grading! As a Franklin guy, I can't tell
    you how many poorly struck '54-S I've seen graded 65. Worse yet, how many Walkers in 66-68 with
    no hand!! Graders sometimes get caught up in color or blemishes and ignore strike.

    Last year I sent in a 1953P Franklin that was simply the best-struck for this date that I have seen
    in 30 years of collecting, yet it came back a '64 because 1) it was brilliant, and 2) it had ONE reed mark
    on the bell...go figure!
  • Options
    FullStepJeffsFullStepJeffs Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    I guess another question is... has anyone ever tried to make a listing of all the graded Full Step 53-S's out there, including pictures and partial cert #'s in order to accurately figure it out?

    It may take years, if ever, to be able to complete the task, if we were to try to do it, or everyone with a 53-S in full steps could place a picture here of their own coin, with the partial cert # and we would have somewhat of a list to reference. It's sad that many other coins have this provenance due to rarity, but this one, and other top dawgs within this series do not.

    Another question... just wondering off the top of my head... if people would be interested in a book like that of the top dawgs in this series as a guide... many of the stratosphere coins in this series sold this year... the only problems would be to get the cert #'s in order to track them if the picture included wasn't adequate and to possibly get the owners to allow their use in a format like this.

    Just trying to think long term...

    Steve

    Edited to say: After looking at a few of these FS coins with pictures online and many, many other 53-S's, once again, it seems like the strike is weak on most of them. Again, I'm not dogging their owners at all. I think the grading companies have factored that in with the grades given possibly. Just a thought... maybe I'm wrong... but, I'll defer to the huddled masses for the concensus.
    U.S. Air Force Security Forces Retired

    In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
  • Options
    keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you view the closeup of the reverse, the strike is horrible (but it has steps).

    this topic has been discussed many, many times in the past. the problem isn't necessarily a poor strike as it is a strike with overused dies. if you look at both sides of the coin under the close-ups, you can clearly see the fatigue in the fields and starting to show in the devices. this is logical, since the fields receive wear each and every strike at a much higher degree than the rest of the die, hence, they wear first. next will be the lower portions of the devices----on the obverse, Jeffersons jacket at the fields and his temple. on the reverse, it's especially visible on the left side of the Monticello. believe it or not, i've seen worse.

    it's ironic that others talk about better strikes with no step detail and/or lesser grades with Full Steps since those both are sensible if you consider the striking anomalies of Jeffersons. in the case of this well-worn die(or pair of dies, considering that the obverse looks quite faint, also) it should be remembered that even the crispest strikes rarely resulted in Fully Struck steps which means that area of the die would wear at a slower rate than the rest of the die, resulting in better detail.

    it should further be noted that this kind of die wear is particularly noted on Nickel coinage, a reflection of the hardness of the alloy and the difficulty of full strikes. it resulted in removing the rays from Shield Nickels and along with a stingy Mint, helped give us all those sharply struck Bullalo branch Mint coins. it's also very problematic with Ike Dollars, but only the clads. imagine that!!!

    al h.image
  • Options
    image

    image

    image

    Hows this one look?

    Hope you can see it.

    Regards, Steve.
  • Options
    FullStepJeffsFullStepJeffs Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
    Actually, I kind of like the color of that one... please don't take this the wrong way, but I don't think that would end up as Full Steps... maybe it's just the picture, but it seems as though there could be a bridge or weakness on step 4 at pilar 2 and a cut of some kind under pilar 3... again, I like the color of the coin and the strike looks better than alot I've seen.

    Thanks for sharing it with us.

    Steve
    U.S. Air Force Security Forces Retired

    In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
  • Options
    stephunterstephunter Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭
    "Hows this one look"

    The steps look pretty nice, but there are a couple of bridges that would keep it out of a pcgs fs holder. Fair strike on the obverse, but weak as typical on the reverse.

  • Options
    Shouldn't there be a sixth step? I saw a MS66 go for over $300.00 a few weeks ago...it's now in the registry. Looked like a very nice coin and congrats to the new owner.

    Enjoy your coins....




    NICKEL TRIUMPH...BIG AIR
    NICKEL TRIUMPH...
  • Options
  • Options
    Yea,

    I agree that it would probably not be PCGS FS.

    Hav'nt yet tried to slab it. Don't know that I will.

    That's the finest 53-S I ran across in 25 years of chasing the FS.

    and probably the finest non FS 53-S out there. (lucky me)

    Regards, Steve.
  • Options
    This one looks pretty good to me: FS 53s -mark-
  • Options
    leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,354 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If you view the closeup of the reverse, the strike is horrible (but it has steps).

    this topic has been discussed many, many times in the past. the problem isn't necessarily a poor strike as it is a strike with overused dies. if you look at both sides of the coin under the close-ups, you can clearly see the fatigue in the fields and starting to show in the devices. this is logical, since the fields receive wear each and every strike at a much higher degree than the rest of the die, hence, they wear first. next will be the lower portions of the devices----on the obverse, Jeffersons jacket at the fields and his temple. on the reverse, it's especially visible on the left side of the Monticello. believe it or not, i've seen worse.

    it's ironic that others talk about better strikes with no step detail and/or lesser grades with Full Steps since those both are sensible if you consider the striking anomalies of Jeffersons. in the case of this well-worn die(or pair of dies, considering that the obverse looks quite faint, also) it should be remembered that even the crispest strikes rarely resulted in Fully Struck steps which means that area of the die would wear at a slower rate than the rest of the die, resulting in better detail.

    it should further be noted that this kind of die wear is particularly noted on Nickel coinage, a reflection of the hardness of the alloy and the difficulty of full strikes. it resulted in removing the rays from Shield Nickels and along with a stingy Mint, helped give us all those sharply struck Bullalo branch Mint coins. it's also very problematic with Ike Dollars, but only the clads. imagine that!!!

    al h.image >>



    Very well said Keets! image

    Steve
    You better hope Corso doesn't see that coin! Very nice strike, eye appeal and steps! Besides my coin, I'm aware of only one other like it and that's the B. Nagengast example! image

    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • Options
    leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,354 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>This one looks pretty good to me: FS 53s -mark- >>



    Thanks Mark but everyone here has already seen that crummy coin! lol
    Now I need to go and look at Corso's collection for about the third time
    so I can tell him what I think of it. image

    Leo image

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • Options
    wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,684 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I just picked up the PCGS-MS65FS POP 1/0 example for Justhavingfun. I suspect he will be pleased when he sees it next year upon his return to the states.

    Wondercoin

    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • Options
    leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,354 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I just picked up the PCGS-MS65FS POP 1/0 example for Justhavingfun. I suspect he will be pleased when he sees it next year upon his return to the states.

    Wondercoin >>



    Is there any chance that you could give us a full description in respect to it's strike, condition and steps? How does it fair against Steve's coin?

    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • Options
    wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,684 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Leo: That will be JHF's perogative once he sees his coin. I can tell you that it did NOT cost $125,000, so if you are the "guy with the $125,000 FS 1953-S", you will still own the most expensive 53(s) nickel !! image

    Incidently, Steve had an MS64FS I assume? What did you think of that coin?

    Wondercoin
    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
Sign In or Register to comment.