Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

1927 sixpences poll: (1) or (2)? (#2 obverse reimaged)

And why?

Both are proofs. (1) is an oddment, blast white and uncleaned while (2) is nicely toned and from a matched set.

(1)
image

(2)
image
Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.

Comments

  • They are both stunning, I'd be happy to have either image
    "Any fool can use Power, but it is our wits that make us men."

    Collecting Penguins, Named Ship Coins and other assorted goodies

    Looking for Circulated coins of Papua New Guinea

    stores.ebay.com/Grumpy's-Cave
  • I agree with PP, I would go with the one that matches the rest of the coins in the set.
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
  • They're both gorgeous, but the second one is tarnishing.
  • harashaharasha Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I actually liked #2 better, but for that marking above the eye. I think the toning gives the coin more character, and brings out details.
    Honors flysis Income beezis Onches nobis Inob keesis

    DPOTD
  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭
    I actually liked #2 better, but for that marking above the eye.

    Y'know, I just looked at #2 in hand again. There is no marking above the eye. I don't even see any dust on it. I'll have to reimage it.
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.


  • << <i>I actually liked #2 better, but for that marking above the eye. I think the toning gives the coin more character, and brings out details. >>



    I see the tone as distracting from the details.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,386 ✭✭✭✭✭
    number 2

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • AuldFartteAuldFartte Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭✭
    #2 for me, too. I've developed a "thing" for toned British proofs lately image
    image

    My OmniCoin Collection
    My BankNoteBank Collection
    Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭
    #2 obverse reimaged. Note that the "marking above the eye" referred to by harasha was an artifact of the previous image and not on the coin.
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.
  • They are both gorgeous coins, Tom. I had to vote for #2 thought because I reallly like the look that the toning is giving the coin.image
  • I always like a nice toner. I do not know what it is, but I think that British designs just flat out are more attractive with some nice color. There are very few British coins that actually look really nice in blast white. IMHO.

    Steve
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,445 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #2 The toning makes the coin IMO.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭
    #2 - which one has the deepest, most hairline-free mirrors?
  • MSD61MSD61 Posts: 3,382
    I really like number 2image
  • Although I have a strong preference for toned coins I might go with the White coin this time. It may be nothing more than a toning spot but the second coin appears to have the slightest rub or "cabinet friction" at the high spot on George's cheekbone. So based solely on the image I would probably go with #1.

    Bob
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    I'll take number 2 pleaseimage
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • AskariAskari Posts: 3,713
    #2 by a hair, but really, I agree you should go with whichever makes the better match for your set.
    Askari



    Come on over ... to The Dark Side! image
  • I'll take either one, but I chose #2, nice color and tonining, the obverse on #2 looks better/sharper to me...
  • AethelredAethelred Posts: 9,288 ✭✭✭
    I like them both, but went with #2
    If you are in the Western North Carolina area, please consider visiting our coin shop:

    WNC Coins, LLC
    1987-C Hendersonville Road
    Asheville, NC 28803


    wnccoins.com
  • JoesMaNameJoesMaName Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭
    I voted for #2, a hard choice as both are gorgeous.
  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭
    Thanks for the opinions and votes.

    I decided. Sixpence #1 is up for sale on ebay as we "speak."
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.
Sign In or Register to comment.