It can't hurt. However, one of the reasons I like currency more than coins now and moving my collection interest there, is that the graded craze isn't as strong yet in currency.
What took them so long? Seems like a no brainer. I use to dable in currency, and I always wondered why PCGS and NGC had not ventured into grading currency.
grading of paper is much less subjective than coins, imo. a crisp-unc is a crisp-unc is a crisp-unc. there's not brownies points for rainbow toning or dmpl, or full-split-nostril hairs, or any of the other baloney that's been dumped on coin collectors by plastic co's. also, since serial #'s can easily be traced, provenance and "grading consistency" is not an issue.
<< <i>grading of paper is much less subjective than coins, imo. a crisp-unc is a crisp-unc is a crisp-unc. >>
Yeah, and a MS65 is an MS65 is an MS65. I can envision all sorts of degrees of grading possible. (Not that that's a good thing, mind you.)
<< <i>i question the necessity of such a service. >>
You question the necessity of all such services. Why should this one be any different?
Anyways, such a move by NGC is unsurprising. Next up would be postage stamps, I would guess. CU has owned this (admittedly small) market for a long time; I gotta think NGC would be gunning for them soon.
The will probably have at least 10 CU grades, comparable to MS. For example, CU-60 could be poorly centered, dull looking, etc. whereas CU-69 could be perfectly centered, wide margins, fresh ink, etc, kinda like "superb" for (gasp!) stamps!
<< <i>CU has owned this (admittedly small) market for a long time; I gotta think NGC would be gunning for them soon. >>
I really can't see NGC getting in to stamp grading. It's a money loser for PCGS. The division grades fewer stamps in a year than they grade coins each month.
<< <i>Next up would be postage stamps, I would guess.
I heard that David Hall had his eye on the Beanie Baby slabbing market. It is wide open at this time. >>
There are actually quite a few Beanie Baby authentication services on the market today, some of which actually 'seal' the Beanie Babies with the authentication certificates (Don't ask me how I know this, I don't collect them).
There are actually quite a few Beanie Baby authentication services on the market today, some of which actually 'seal' the Beanie Babies with the authentication certificates (Don't ask me how I know this, I don't collect them).
Oh. I was just joking.
BTW dthigpen, do you collect holed Beanie Babies? Not the ones that are holed intentionally, but the true, contemporarily holed Beanie Babies. They are rare.
<< <i>There are actually quite a few Beanie Baby authentication services on the market today, some of which actually 'seal' the Beanie Babies with the authentication certificates (Don't ask me how I know this, I don't collect them).
Oh. I was just joking.
BTW dthigpen, do you collect holed Beanie Babies? Not the ones that are holed intentionally, but the true, contemporarily holed Beanie Babies. They are rare. >>
I was too, and only ones naturally holed by small children
Comments
That's not a bad idea.
Our eBay auctions - TRUE auctions: start at $0.01, no reserve, 30 day unconditional return privilege & free shipping!
i question the necessity of such a service.
K S
<< <i>grading of paper is much less subjective than coins, imo. a crisp-unc is a crisp-unc is a crisp-unc. >>
Yeah, and a MS65 is an MS65 is an MS65. I can envision all sorts of degrees of grading possible. (Not that that's a good thing, mind you.)
<< <i>i question the necessity of such a service. >>
You question the necessity of all such services. Why should this one be any different?
Anyways, such a move by NGC is unsurprising. Next up would be postage stamps, I would guess. CU has owned this (admittedly small) market for a long time; I gotta think NGC would be gunning for them soon.
<< <i>CU has owned this (admittedly small) market for a long time; I gotta think NGC would be gunning for them soon. >>
I really can't see NGC getting in to stamp grading. It's a money loser for PCGS. The division grades fewer stamps in a year than they grade coins each month.
Russ, NCNE
Next up would be postage stamps, I would guess.
I heard that David Hall had his eye on the Beanie Baby slabbing market. It is wide open at this time.
Our eBay auctions - TRUE auctions: start at $0.01, no reserve, 30 day unconditional return privilege & free shipping!
<< <i>Next up would be postage stamps, I would guess.
I heard that David Hall had his eye on the Beanie Baby slabbing market. It is wide open at this time. >>
There are actually quite a few Beanie Baby authentication services on the market today, some of which actually 'seal' the Beanie Babies with the authentication certificates (Don't ask me how I know this, I don't collect them).
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
There are actually quite a few Beanie Baby authentication services on the market today, some of which actually 'seal' the Beanie Babies with the authentication certificates (Don't ask me how I know this, I don't collect them).
Oh. I was just joking.
BTW dthigpen, do you collect holed Beanie Babies? Not the ones that are holed intentionally, but the true, contemporarily holed Beanie Babies. They are rare.
PS - sorry for the hijacked thread Wayne!
Our eBay auctions - TRUE auctions: start at $0.01, no reserve, 30 day unconditional return privilege & free shipping!
<< <i>There are actually quite a few Beanie Baby authentication services on the market today, some of which actually 'seal' the Beanie Babies with the authentication certificates (Don't ask me how I know this, I don't collect them).
Oh. I was just joking.
BTW dthigpen, do you collect holed Beanie Babies? Not the ones that are holed intentionally, but the true, contemporarily holed Beanie Babies. They are rare. >>
I was too, and only ones naturally holed by small children
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
Dead Celebrity Pets Guarantee Corp.... where they stuff em and seal em.
<< <i><< i question the necessity of such a service. >> You question the necessity of all such services. Why should this one be any different? >>
simple, it's absurd to "certify" the "grade" of something that has a SERIAL NUMBER integral to it.
K S