Home U.S. Coin Forum

Does anyone know what a roll of 1983-P quarters in uncirculated condition would go for?

Does anyone know what a roll of 1983-P quarters in uncirculated condition would go for? Assuming an original bank wrapped roll. Here is an auction for one on eBay. It's not very often you can even find one of these. The guy has a reserve price of $875. That seems a little steep to me. What do you think? do you know where I could get a roll cheaper?

Comments

  • wayneherndonwayneherndon Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭
    That's actually a pretty good price. Greysheet Bid is $860 with Ask at $950.

    WH
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That's actually a pretty good price. Greysheet Bid is $860 with Ask at $950. >>



    Thanks for the reply, do you know of any dealers that might have these in stock?

  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    That roll that those quarters are in is no proof that this is an original bank wrapped roll of uncirculated quartes. These paper rolls are the same type that all coins get rewrapped in, whether circulated of from a mint bag from the Fed.
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That roll that those quarters are in is no proof that this is an original bank wrapped roll of uncirculated quartes. These paper rolls are the same type that all coins get rewrapped in, whether circulated of from a mint bag from the Fed. >>



    I have delt with that seller in the past on a group of 10 1983 souvenir sets along with several other items. All together I have probably had 3 or 4 transactions with him and they have all been good. I do believe he would be good on his 7 day no questions asked refund policy if I needed it.
  • wayneherndonwayneherndon Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭
    IrishMike,

    You are partially correct about the wrapper. This wrapper is certainly not proof of originality as you note. This is a wrapper widely used to hand-wrap rolls. Rolls wraps by the Federal Reserve (actually really done by the armored car companies) are machine wrapped rolls. This is not one of those. However, it was not uncommon for smaller banks to hand wrap their own coins instead of paying for wrapping services.

    The seller does not base his "original roll" description on the wrapper, however. He indicates that it is from his personal collection and it he got it at the bank in the year of issue.

    WH
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Pardon my ignorance but do these sell for twenty bucks or more each?
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Wayne you are correct smaller banks get their money and coinage from a larger bank who may have paper wrapped them. I don't remember seeing plastic used in 1983 for coins. I know that at the bank I worked at it was all paper then.
  • wayneherndonwayneherndon Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭
    IrishMike,

    Yes they do.

    WH
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Pardon my ignorance but do these sell for twenty bucks or more each? >>



    Yes they do (in uncirculated grade). I recently sold one graded MS66 by PCGS for $299 though usually $250 is a little more realistic. They really do need to be in uncirculated grade to be worth more than a quarter though. Circulated ones usually don't command a premium.
  • wayneherndonwayneherndon Posts: 2,356 ✭✭✭
    I don't believe the plastic wraps were used in 1983 either. Even today they are still a minority. Most wrapping services still use paper.

    WH
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭
    Attention shoppers: Is there a Mr. Cladking in the house? Paging Mr. Cladking....
  • This seller has been selling rolls, mint sets and proof sets for a couple of years. His personal collection must have been pretty extensive. I have made several purchases from him and was pleased. I think he is a pretty elderly gentleman and he did mess up one of my orders once, but corrected it upon notification.
    image

    image
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Wow I had no idea.
  • $10.00 + $9.00 ins. for shipping a roll of quarters. What a deal!

    Glenn
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭


    << <i>$10.00 + $9.00 ins. for shipping a roll of quarters. What a deal!

    Glenn >>



    Yes, that factors into the bid price for sure. I guess he thought no one would read that part.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,636 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wholesale on this roll is $950. The buyer is pretty picky but would probably accept just about
    anything if they believed it's original. Put together rolls are OK but everything would have to go
    around MS-62 or better. (only about half of souvenir set coins are this quality). There is a market
    for AU and nice XF coins developing. I've seen AU-58's advertised for sale as high as $20 and for
    purchase up to about $15.

    This is one of the most common AU's from the era in circulation because many got pulled out in the
    mid-'80's and they are still trickling back into pocket change.

    About a third of these have the type "d" reverse. All souvenir set issues are type "c" reverse.

    The coin is not plentiful in any grade above nice attractive VF.







    second sentence third paragraph added.
    Tempus fugit.
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I wouldn't give you more than face value.

    Sunnywood >>



    I guess you need not participate in this thread then.
  • I know of the whereabouts of 10 original 1983-p quarter rolls. I don't think they are for sale, at least not yet. I would love to buy that one on ebay... but not sure I can spend that much money when there are also some early Lincolns and Lincoln rolls to buy. image
  • I have seen a few 1983 souvenier sets and the quarters were far better than MS62, as a matter of fact I have never seen a 1983 quarter that bad. I have seen 1981 and earlier all the time, but the 1982 and 1983 sets were low mintage and were of above average quality. That statement was also echoed by others in this forum.


  • << <i>IrishMike,

    Yes they do.

    WH >>



    That's a pretty good price. I've seen them advertised at $34ea for a BU



    Jerry
  • I have had alot of dealings with this seller.

    He was suposedly dying of cancer almost two years ago ands only had months to live. I had good luck at first but then things turned a bit sour.

    He likes to blame his errors on his grandson who is suposedly selling his collection for him. I found too many inconsistencies and he outright defrauded me on a GSA. He also still owes me a refund from almost 18 months ago as well.

    I have found that his rolls are often put together after being cherry picked over. I bought a roll of supposed shotgun wrapped 41 lincoln cents from him that clearly turned out to be coins from 3 different rolls and I found a few D mint coins in that P mint roll.

    I dealt with him alot for awhile, but I won't do it anymore. Bid at your own risk.
    "Lenin is certainly right. There is no subtler or more severe means of overturning the existing basis of society(destroy capitalism) than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
    John Marnard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920, page 235ff
  • It depends on the year and mint mark. The 1983P and 1983D are $10 coins in MS-65 which is hard to reach as many are horribly struck. With that value assigned, that makes a roll worth about $400 which is about right. The 1982P is harder and is a $50 coin in MS-65, hoever the 1982D is also a $10 coin like the 1983's.
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭
    I think you are low on your price estimates. Here is a LINK to an auction for an 83-D in MS65 that just ended. Here is another 83-D LINK. 83-P's go for much more than that.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,636 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's likely that anyone finding much different quality coins in the souvenir sets than someone else
    is caused by a different grading standard rather than different coins. This is especially true if you've
    seen large numbers of sets from large numbers of sources.

    I've never seen any slabbed moderns in lower grades and don't know how the grading companies
    grade at these levels. I do tend to estimate a coin's grade much lower if details are weak or missing
    and have long maintained that for grading clad coins mint state grades are needed down to about
    MS-35. In addition to virtually all of the '83-P souvenir set being less than fully struck there is a lot
    of marking on most coins and the surfaces tend to be less than great. This isn't to say that souvenir
    set coins are worse than roll coins; they aren't. These tend to be struck by newer dies and appear
    to get a little better handling than regular issues. The best I've seen do not even approach the best
    quality of regular mint set coins. The average coin is weakly struck (albeit from new dies) and unat-
    tractive to those for whom strike is an important consideration.

    These coins really do wholesale at $950 per roll. It is extremely easy to retail the clad quarter sets
    but building them hits several road blocks. Many sets are assembled with sliders for key dates but
    even these are getting harder to find. The '83-P is the most difficult date to find in MS-60 so there is
    a very active market for the coin.

    This date is one of the most common of all the eagle reverse clad quarters in AU and XF+ but is the
    toughest in MS-60 to choice unc. There are a few dates that are tougher in gem.

    Tempus fugit.
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭
    I recently broke apart some 1982 souvenir sets and had the best coins graded by PCGS. Here is how the quarters turned out:

    82-P MS62
    82-P MS63
    82-P MS63
    82-P MS63
    82-P MS64
    82-P MS64

    82-D MS63
    82-D MS64
    82-D MS64
    82-D MS64
    82-D MS64
    82-D MS66

    The MS66 was a nice surprise but not the norm. as you can see, this batch averaged around MS63/64 but I didn't send in the worst examples. It's real tough to get 65's and 66's for 82 and 83 even from souvenir sets. As Cladking said, even if the grade is decent the strikes are usually weak.
  • The 83-p quarters in souvinir mint sets have far better strikes than ones from rolls, but far worse luster. I've never seen one with enough luster for ms63+. Ms62 is the norm.

    Thanks for the info Deadhorse. I just bought '65,'66,'67 rolls of Kennedys from him so we'll see. (I probably wouldn't have if I had seen your post first image )
  • rlawsharlawsha Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭
    I think I am starting to get cold feet.....

    LINK TO FEEDBACK

    Hey haletj, can you check on those rolls you know about and see if one might be for sale? image
  • Hmm... Thanks... now I know how to just search to find neg feedback. I looked for a few negs but they were mostly about just taking a bit too long with shipping and such... Oh well, $25 for a roll of 40% Kennedys is not much over the price of silver even!

    No I don't think any are for sale yet from that hoard I know about. I might be going back to that store next month and I'll ask.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,636 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Hmm... Thanks... now I know how to just search to find neg feedback. I looked for a few negs but they were mostly about just taking a bit too long with shipping and such... Oh well, $25 for a roll of 40% Kennedys is not much over the price of silver even!

    No I don't think any are for sale yet from that hoard I know about. I might be going back to that store next month and I'll ask. >>



    Keep me in mind too if any of them are choice or type "d".
    Tempus fugit.
  • I'm using the PCGS current coin values for my analogy. They say $10 a coin in 65. Thats what its worth. Too many nut cases on E-Bay paying way over what something is worth.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,636 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm using the PCGS current coin values for my analogy. They say $10 a coin in 65. Thats what its worth. Too many nut cases on E-Bay paying way over what something is worth. >>



    I haven't actually seen even an MS-60 for sale at less than $25 for a couple years now. It's
    not unusual to see sliders priced for sale as uncs at this price. Forget the price guides on most
    moderns since they are often not current and haven't had years to work out the bugs. Also for-
    get finding a real gem of this date at any price unless it's slabbed. It's been years since I've
    seen a gem for sale. In fact the last gem was in a lot of "10" '83-P souvenir sets I stumbled
    onto about five years ago. Gems are VERY tough in these sets but this one should just barely
    make the grade. It was cheap but only because most people price all moderns this way. The
    other "9" P's were almost all choice.
    Tempus fugit.
  • haletjhaletj Posts: 2,192
    You're joking, right 1956Quarter? The PCGS price guide is the only thing that is a nut-case!

    I got my 1983 quarter like this... bought a 1983-p souvinir set, didn't like it, politely asked the seller if I could return it, and the seller said he has some nicer 1983 BU singles he would exchange. Guess what, I got a great gem 83-p quarter!


  • << <i>Thats what its worth. Too many nut cases on E-Bay paying way over what something is worth. >>



    You are in for a tough ride if you go by the PCGS guide. PCGS's job is to grade coins, not price them. Their "guide" is way off.

    Cameron Kiefer

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file