Home U.S. Coin Forum

Question.... why do Franklin halves grade low

I have been going through the census reports for Franklin halves and noticed that not many grade higher than ms66, is there a reason for this? And before anyone else says it, i know they had defects that kept them from grading higher! was the quality really that low on this series?
If you can read this, your too close.

A DAMMIT BOY from Jonesy 1/25/05

Lieutenant, Covert Operations
Subcommittee

my first POTD award 7/16/05
the cat ate my blue fish.

Comments

  • haletjhaletj Posts: 2,192
    All the coins from 1950 or so until 1964 are lower in quality than most other years. All the hardest ms67 late date Wheat Cents are from the 50's, the early 60's get hard even in ms66. The toughest nickels, dimes, quarters, in ms66/67 are some mid 50's and early 60's. Not only that but I think the wide open space on the Franklin is just more prone to taking a direct hit from other coins and getting nicked up.
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The design has a lot of high smooth surfaces that show and accent wear, bag marks, and rubs. At least that what I think.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Frankies look really good when they are really good and they look really bad when they are not really good.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • The reason i ask this is because i have over 200 of these that have just been removed from the original BANK rolls,i know that these have been bumped together a little before they got rolled. some only show a few minor blemishes, was thinking about sending them in for cert. Found some real nice end roll toned coins also, real frosty white on one side... blue on the other.
    If you can read this, your too close.

    A DAMMIT BOY from Jonesy 1/25/05

    Lieutenant, Covert Operations
    Subcommittee

    my first POTD award 7/16/05
    the cat ate my blue fish.
  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,148 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The design has a lot of high smooth surfaces that show and accent wear, bag marks, and rubs. At least that what I think. >>

    Bingo--there's no place for marks to hide, so they constantly get killed when graded (busy designs, at least, can "mask" some smaller chatter). This is why the high grades often have the heavy mint set toning--it can mask small marks.

    Also, the strikes on many Franklins are poor--that's a big factor in the grades.

    Jeremy
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,232 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The design has a lot of high smooth surfaces that show and accent wear, bag marks, and rubs. At least that what I think. >>

    Bingo--there's no place for marks to hide, so they constantly get killed when graded (busy designs, at least, can "mask" some smaller chatter). This is why the high grades often have the heavy mint set toning--it can mask small marks.

    Also, the strikes on many Franklins are poor--that's a big factor in the grades.

    Jeremy >>


    Well said- Jeremy and LindeDad

    Kidd-- Send in a few of the best and test the waters.
    Franklins are a bit tough to get a handle on.image
    Larry

  • foodudefoodude Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭
    The above comments pretty much cover it- relatively heavy coins, open design, and many poor quality strikes = tough to find in high grade; FBLs in high grade being even tougher to find. It is not uncommon to go through roll after roll after orignal (bank wrapped) roll and not find anything over MS64. However, occasionally one lucks out and will find several MS65s in a single roll.
    Greg Allen Coins, LLC Show Schedule: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/573044/our-show-schedule-updated-10-2-16 Authorized dealer for NGC, PCGS, CAC, and QA. Member of PNG, RTT (Founding Platinum Member), FUN, MSNS, and NCBA (formerly ICTA); Life Member of ANA and CSNS. NCBA Board member. "GA3" on CCE.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295


    << <i>Frankies look really good when they are really good and they look really bad when they are not really good. >>



    I thought they looked really bad all the time? image
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Frankies look really good when they are really good and they look really bad when they are not really good. >>



    Reminds me of the ex-wife!!!!!!
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • Be nice you guys! image

    image
  • Because if they grade low I can afford them image


    imageimage
  • foodudefoodude Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭
    Uh, Frank (Pug Dog) are you holding out on me, or did I already buy that Franklin you postedimage
    Greg Allen Coins, LLC Show Schedule: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/573044/our-show-schedule-updated-10-2-16 Authorized dealer for NGC, PCGS, CAC, and QA. Member of PNG, RTT (Founding Platinum Member), FUN, MSNS, and NCBA (formerly ICTA); Life Member of ANA and CSNS. NCBA Board member. "GA3" on CCE.


  • << <i>Uh, Frank (Pug Dog) are you holding out on me >>




    Ooopsy - did I forget one? image
  • rainbowroosierainbowroosie Posts: 4,874 ✭✭✭✭
    Design -- any little mark jumps out at you.....same number of marks on a Walker would look GEM!
    "You keep your 1804 dollar and 1822 half eagle -- give me rainbow roosies in MS68."
    rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
  • Much of it is covered except for maybe that the coin wasnt taken very seriously by dealers for many years, so they were mishandled. This I believe led to more marks as well.
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file