Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

argh!

Comments

  • DirtyHarryDirtyHarry Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭
    "Hang 'em High" - 1968. Another one of my Clint favorites. image
    Proud of my 16x20 autographed and framed collection - all signed in person. Not big on modern - I'm stuck in the past!
  • kobykoby Posts: 1,699 ✭✭
    That's a shame
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    edit: lost scan
    Mike
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I like the (not psa) in the title
    also, looks like the auction was SHILLED too.
    Good for you.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Are those reprints? Would even PRO stoop so low as to slab reprints without calling them such?
  • pandrewspandrews Posts: 7,598 ✭✭✭
    the Cobb appears to be wider than the other 3.. it fills up the black border right to left more than the others..
    ·p_A·
  • stevekstevek Posts: 29,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    jrdolan - I have wondered the same thing. There are websites out there whereby people have intentionally sent Pro Grading knowingly trimmed cards - the sender did the trimming, and the cards came back graded. Wonder if anyone has any links to a website whereby somebody intentionally sent a grading company reprints to see if they would still grade them as genuine? Of course PSA grades reprints but always marks them as reprints. Personally - I think PSA lowers their fine character and reputation by grading reprints - just my opinion.
  • AllenAllen Posts: 7,165 ✭✭✭
    I think PSA only grades licensed reprints, which would be marked. those would be counterfeits and unmarked- those are the ones people try to pass off on people.
Sign In or Register to comment.