NGC vs PCGS
TerrapinWill
Posts: 848
Two questions
1. Which is better or more reliable...PCGS or NGC?
2. What would be a fair price for a set of Silver Eagles in MS-69 condition, graded by either service?
1. Which is better or more reliable...PCGS or NGC?
2. What would be a fair price for a set of Silver Eagles in MS-69 condition, graded by either service?
0
Comments
You can get a good idea of fair value for MS 69 Eagles by searching for them on eBay and/or on dealer web sites. Don't forget to include shipping costs when calculating how much you might pay for them.
When it comes to modern coins like Silver Eagles PCGS is the better choice.IMO
If you purchase these coins in NGC holders, you will have less real dollar risk because you paid less if the value goes south and if prices increase then you will reap less. I have seen many modern sets get sold at losses and some at gains. You just don't read much hear about those sold at losses.
I went to www.tulving.com to see if he offered complete sets of ASE's,
but couldn't find any.
I did find this, however...1 kilo Gold Roosters from Australia!
well for me if i look at a coin and if i like it lots!!! and also the price then the coin is for me
then if it is in a pcgs or ngc holder .................
just a plus for me as the holder in general is good protection for a coin and in the current market these holders are a comfort with their acceptance and implied guarantees
michael
michael
<< <i>Stop watching Coin Vault ! >>
<< <i>Which is better or more reliable...PCGS or NGC? >>
Both are equally accurate (about 75-80%) - High-end NGC coins are often crossed to PCGS holders giving the appearance that NGC grades "looser". But if you consider that say an MS 65 grade would range from 64.9 to 66.1 (a real high end 64 could well get called a 65, and a low end 66, could "just miss"), and many of the NGC coins in the 65.7 to 66.1 range are crossed (or at least many are tried for crossover), it is likely the the remaining population of NGC coins will give the appearance of being lower in over-all quality for the assigned grade and conversely it will appear that PCGS has more high-end coins for the assigned grade. But the initially grading accuracy is pretty much the same when initially graded.
Think of it like 2 bottles of milk from different cows - if you skim the cream from one bottle and put it all in the other bottle, if you just look at the end result, you're gonna think that one cow produces more cream - they actually produce the same amt of cream, its just that it mostly ends up in one of the bottles because of the preception that PCGS coins are worth more money.
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain
Newmismatist
What are they inconsisitent about?
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
ANACS does a very good job at grading!
Cameron Kiefer
When you think about if for a moment- say I'm living in Kansas, (ICG) the shortest time span that I would or should see depending on what is submitted could logically be turned around in 6-8 days in economy.
Personally feel that this would be a reasonable time frame. If you live in say New Hampshire- send to Ohio(Anacs), Texas- send to NGC, Oregon- send to PCGS, split the state into 4 and let each have a fair market share, NOW if you don't like the grade from one of the consortium- and you want to submit to the other the price should triple but the run time remain.
I know this will stir some hellacious controversy.....
Joe