Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Need infomation on a proof set

Today I ordered a Swedish 1950 Proof Set. The coins are all certified proof by PCGS. The problem I have is the set isn't listed in Krause. Krause also doesn't have a proof listing for the individual coins. Any information such as mintage on this set is greatly appreciated.

DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


Don

Comments

  • told ya it was fake!! imageimage
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,445 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>told ya it was fake!! >>


    You mean just like my Proof 1958 1/2d?

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • yea! just like that one!! image
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
  • Do you have a picture?
    Longshot: There are patterns of that date listed in Krause that have PROV on them. Perhaps that was misconstrued as proof? They're listed as Rare.
    Brad Swain

    World Coin & PM Collector
    My Coin Info Pages <> My All Experts Profile
    image
  • The Swiss did not really make proof strikes at that time - at least not proof strikes the way we understand them today. They did, however, each year make a few "first strikes" with polished dies and called the result "specimens". I have seen quite a few of these specimens offered as proofs and that is probably the explanation to your "proof set". They look fantastic, but they are not proofs.

    Some of the early specimens are made in very limited numbers and that might be the reason why Krause does not list them. Besides, Switzerland is not the only country where Krause either has missing proof- or specimen versions of circulation coins or list such coins that do not exist! In the Danish listings you will find quite a few examples of coins listed as separate proof strikes where no such strikes were ever made.

    Marcel
    Ebay user name: 00MadMuffin00
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,445 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Marcel, thanks for the info but my set is from Sweden, not Switzerland. image

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • I have two books on Swedish coins, and neither of them mentions proofs. 1950 is the year when the monarch changed from Gustaf V to Gustaf VI Adolf.

    It might be some sort of special set for the new king or something in memory of the former one depending on which king it is for. Do you have any pictures?

    I have several friends in Sweden, and will ask them.

    Bob
    I like Ikes!! But I especially like Viking Ships, Swedish Plate Money, and all coins Scandinavian.
    imageimageimageimageimage
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,445 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't have pictures at this moment. The set was shipped out yesterday and I should have them tomorrow or Saturday. I'll try to get images when they arrive.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • I just checked a third book, and there is a listing of Provmynt (Trial coins)and there is nothing listed for them there also.

    Bob
    I like Ikes!! But I especially like Viking Ships, Swedish Plate Money, and all coins Scandinavian.
    imageimageimageimageimage
  • Oops! imageimageimage

    Well, fortunately I also know a bit about Swedish coins image
    Sweden did not officially strike proof coins in the fifties - or sixties for that matter. However, occasionally the coins can be found in superior mint state with a slight cameo effect and free of scratches. Such coins are designated as "brilliant uncirculated" in Sweden where grading is very strict.

    If these coins are slabbed by PCGS as proofs I would consider that an error. On the other hand, a perfectly struck circulation coin on a good flan could qualify as a proof by US definitions, couldn't it? Anyway, these coins might be accepted as proofs in the US but not in Scandinavia.

    The Swedish grading is so strict that if a coin does not have a full, strong strike, full original lustre and a planchet free of the usual nicks and scratches it will not even be labeled UNC. I know a Swedish coin dealer that I often buy world coins from. Most of the stuff he considers AU is UNC by my definitions and that reduces the price somewhat image

    Marcel
    Ebay user name: 00MadMuffin00
  • MSD61MSD61 Posts: 3,382
    Interesting information Marcel it explains why it was so hard to find info on ajaan's setimage
  • 1jester1jester Posts: 8,637 ✭✭✭
    "On the other hand, a perfectly struck circulation coin on a good flan could qualify as a proof by US definitions, couldn't it?" --MM

    I don't believe so. It might look mighty nice (and I avidly collect such coins from circulation when I can find them) but a proof coin has to undergo a special process at the mint, hence excluding any circulation issue from being called a proof.

    imageimageimage
    .....GOD
    image

    "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9

    "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5

    "For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,445 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Marcel, what you are describing are Proof Like coins. Perhaps similar to the coins Canada produced before 1982. hmmmm . . . now I REALLY want to see these coins but I'll have to wait at least until tomorrow.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
Sign In or Register to comment.