I really like the Epson Perfection 1670 my wife and I got not long ago. She is using it to digitize family photos and it really simplifies the process. I know it's about ten times as fast as the 4 year old beast I'd been using. It automatically senses what part to scan, whereas I'm used to doing that manually. Some older scanners don't seem to handle graded cards very well....either the card or the "flip" are out of focus....No issues like that on this one.
Good luck in finding the one that's right for you. I have a feeling you'll get a lot of responses to this post.
I'm a big fan of MicroTek scanners. The two keys though, are to scan at a higher resolution than you need and then reduce it (I don't know why this matters but it does - try it out if you're skeptical); and to set the "descreen" setting to the maximum (this will prevent the checkerboard pattern often seen on graded card scans).
I use an Epson Perfection 2400, you can see my scans under Magellan's 1969 set , or 1977 set, or 1965 set , or Yaz basic set. I think it does a pretty nice job. Also Joe is correct about scanning at a higher resolution then reducing.
and i'll toss in my plug for the HP scanners... got a 6200C about 5 years ago for @ $50 on ebay... works perfect and with the right software you can make any scanner do just about anything.
I will plug HP had one but no I gave it away when I bought my NEW PC that came with a Lexmark. Wish I had my HP lexmark is crap. ( blurry) Flats are great.
<< <i>How do you go about reducing the resolution after you scan your item?? >>
brian I have an HP and what I think he means is - first I scan the item using a higher dpi - I have been using 300. I found 200 works good also. Then before I "accept" the scan, I reduce the size from 100% to something that will fit better on the screen - it appears that the higher dpi one uses, the smaller % you have to use or you'll wind up with something that looks like Texas on the screen! suffering from post Thanxgiving cheer your friend Mike
Comments
I really like the Epson Perfection 1670 my wife and I got not long ago. She is using it to digitize family photos and it really simplifies the process. I know it's about ten times as fast as the 4 year old beast I'd been using. It automatically senses what part to scan, whereas I'm used to doing that manually. Some older scanners don't seem to handle graded cards very well....either the card or the "flip" are out of focus....No issues like that on this one.
Good luck in finding the one that's right for you. I have a feeling you'll get a lot of responses to this post.
Todd
Joe
Now collecting:
Topps Heritage
1957 Topps BB Ex+-NM
All Yaz Items 7+
Various Red Sox
Did I leave anything out?
great for photos, documents, etc plugs directly into USB.
regards
Dennis - Canada
hockey,baseball, Tiger Woods,Vince Carter,Michael Jordan
Ilya Kovalchuk,
-traded with Doplo,Thito,Autograph,
Derrick,BigE187211,Stonepran,
skivermont,bond4prez,bystander.
Scott2141,bb141516,dallas822,
clearandvalid,Geno,freeblue,
Ebay feedback (744)
Paypal is available
9-11-01 WE WILL NEVER FORGET
<< <i>scan at a higher resolution than you need and then reduce it >>
Alan,
How do you go about reducing the resolution after you scan your item??
You have me confused??
James
<< <i>How do you go about reducing the resolution after you scan your item?? >>
brian
I have an HP and what I think he means is - first I scan the item using a higher dpi - I have been using 300. I found 200 works good also. Then before I "accept" the scan, I reduce the size from 100% to something that will fit better on the screen - it appears that the higher dpi one uses, the smaller % you have to use or you'll wind up with something that looks like Texas on the screen!
suffering from post Thanxgiving cheer
your friend
Mike
Thanks,
David (LD_Ferg)
1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06