1933 Goudey Rogers Hornsby PSA 5; $425 v. $220
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46d9d/46d9d31c059edbc2786007bd9b0f465ec956e332" alt="JackWESQ"
My favorite card is the 1933 Goudey Rogers Hornsby. I track this
card regularly. Recently, two PSA 5's came up for auction. Before,
either auction ended, I determine that the later ending auction had
the better card, even though both were graded PSA 5. The first card
sold for $220.50. Here is the link and picture:
1933 Goudey Rogers Hornsby PSA 5; Card 1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1277/e127789bfc147e4dbe8d1c2b1e1d1a34afdd6547" alt="image"
The second card sold for $425.50! Wow! Here is the link and picture:
1933 Goudey Rogers Hornsby PSA 5; Card 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f4a/70f4a70d20b5e56dea92fd1fcf873e3e0a0058fa" alt="image"
Is this a great example of buying the card and not the holder? So much so
that the latter card second sold for almost twice the former card. Crazy!
/s/ JackWESQ
card regularly. Recently, two PSA 5's came up for auction. Before,
either auction ended, I determine that the later ending auction had
the better card, even though both were graded PSA 5. The first card
sold for $220.50. Here is the link and picture:
1933 Goudey Rogers Hornsby PSA 5; Card 1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1277/e127789bfc147e4dbe8d1c2b1e1d1a34afdd6547" alt="image"
The second card sold for $425.50! Wow! Here is the link and picture:
1933 Goudey Rogers Hornsby PSA 5; Card 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f4a/70f4a70d20b5e56dea92fd1fcf873e3e0a0058fa" alt="image"
Is this a great example of buying the card and not the holder? So much so
that the latter card second sold for almost twice the former card. Crazy!
/s/ JackWESQ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce298/ce29846337f8da14a21a52c9254db91d327465aa" alt="image"
0
Comments
He was being an honest seller by showing the back of the card, but it may have cost him $$$$.
I agree with pandrews the photo of the second card doesn't give any indication to the actual condition of the card.