Home U.S. Coin Forum

The 1952 Lincoln Cent

Too bad this didn't get off the ground. I think it beats the current Lincoln cent

image

The following information is courtesy of Roger Burdette (listed on uspatterns.com)

In December 1951 sculptor James E. Fraser, designer of the Buffalo nickel and several commemorative coins, sent unsolicited obverse and reverse designs for a new Lincoln cent to Director Nellie Tayloe Ross. Upon viewing the models, Director Ross wrote, "...It is with a real thrill of admiration and appreciation I behold these beautiful productions of your art. The portrait of Lincoln impresses me as being incomparably better than the one now impressed upon the one-cent piece."

The obverse featured a large scale portrait of Lincoln, not unlike Fraser's 1911 concept. The reverse showed an oak tree, "...as a symbol because Lincoln was a woodsman...It stands too for strength, ever renewing growth, and unity. Like a nation, it has roots, a trunk, branches, flowers and finally fruit."

Director Ross was so impressed that she convinced the Secretary of the Treasury to permit pattern coins to be struck. Forty-six pieces were coined on May 7, 1952 and another 100 were made from dies of slightly lower relief on June 19. Although Ross, the Secretary and others gave strong support to the new Lincoln cent design, the change was not to occur. Demand for coinage surged and the Mint Bureau could barely keep up with normal production: the project was scrapped in March 1953.

The 146 pattern cents were certified as being destroyed on March 16, 1953, the dies were locked in the Engraver's safe and the models stuck in storage at the Philadelphia Mint. In 1995, numismatist Bill Fivaz chanced to photograph the obverse model.

Photo attached is by Bill Fivaz. It is not known whether the photo is of a galvano or a colored plaster model. (Would this or a similar portrait be a suitable replacement on the cent in 1909?)
image
My posts viewed image times
since 8/1/6

Comments

  • That pattern is a beauty!! I wish our mint would put more relief in our coins. Anyone else like the reverseof the Iowa quarter?? image
  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    Its a gorgeous pattern. I like the high relief aspect. It would require alot of striking pressure, and the Mint is all about saving $$$ these days.
  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it.image
  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it but I wonder what kind of problems there would be with striking circulation coins in quantity given what appears to be a relatively high relief.
    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • It probably wouldn't work as a circulation coin because of the relief, but that isn't, or shouldn't be, a problem in making a high relief commemorative with it (hint, hint).
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    Since the Mint expects to get a million strikes from each die for circ strikes, we'll never see another coin that has significant relief. But why they apply the same concept to commems escapes me.

    That's a cool looking concept and I never knew they had done any patterns like that.

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file