Home U.S. Coin Forum

coin photo: before and after, opinions?

not happy with my overexposed NGC-MS65BN, 1904 U.S.-Philippines half centavo. Took several shots last night; finally sttling for a shot on 2048 size, medium black slab covering(letting some of the white in to partially confuse the camera!), moderate light and taking the shot from 3" away(not 1.75" minimum where the light is too intense). I think I got the right balance of proper brightness, toning and luster. These ngc holders are a killer! Opinions on other options I have?
image
image
USPI minimalist design collage
image
designset
Treasury Seals Type Set

Comments

  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
    Not having seen the actual coin (and it being, apparently, a somewhat unusually colored coin) I really have no idea which pictire is a better representative of the coin's true color and look.

    The second picture is more appealing to me, but I doubt thats a useful criteria unless your goal is to make artwork.


  • figured I throw the reverse on for a complete set!
    image
    USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They look good. Here they are tweaked a bit with Photoshop:

    imageimage

    How do they look in comparison to the real coin?

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    A coin imager's nightmare - colorfully toned BN copper under NGC plastic image

    Your reverse image is beautiful. I prefer it to the PhotoShoped version MS70 posted, though he did a great job. You could take hundreds of images of that obverse before finally shooting it to your satisfaction. Makes you appreciate what photographers who work for major dealers/auction houses struggle with on a daily basis, they don't get paid to take hundreds of pics of the same coin.

    I've always felt that an image that needs more than minor tweeking in photo editing software needs to be shot again. Your image of the reverse is a bit dark but I sense the luster and wonderful underlying color was nailed. When you start jacking up the brightness in Photoshop those qualities become watered down. For every correction Photoshop makes in one area, in this case brightness, other qualities suffer, in this case contrast. Trying to counter the added brightness with added contrast doesn't work, it starts an endless cycle of image quality loss. Photoshop should only be used as a minor compliment to your camera. When you start using it to recreate images that weren't shot well to begin with it's time to send the pic to your waste basket.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I like your second, slightly darker pics. They show the color and detail pretty well, esp. the rev. If you think that the second shot represents the coin well, then those are the ones you should keep. And yes NGC slabs are a PITA to shoot.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • the darker pics are the ones that indeed match the look of the actual coin. No tweaking was made and that's why I like the shots even more. What I truly like is that the thimbnail versions of the coin in Irfanview's software really make the coin look for real!imageimage
    USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file