ANACS Submission Torn Into to Provide BETTER Photos!
braddick
Posts: 23,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
Okay... okay... I ripped open the envelope, took out the Morgans, and re-photographed them! In reference to an earlier thread (Dealers and old graysheets...) I now provide these photos!
(TDN: Does the color on the 1884 look "better" now?!)
And, just for good measure, here are a couple of others in the same submission batch...
(TDN: Does the color on the 1884 look "better" now?!)
And, just for good measure, here are a couple of others in the same submission batch...
peacockcoins
0
Comments
<< <i>can't the fingerprint be removed gently? It is a knockout coin.. >>
I'm thinking about it. You know what? They barely show up on the coin but sure blast out on the photo.
Let me go re-open the package and do what it is I can do...
Results soon...
peacockcoins
peacockcoins
Im not to smart on these things but I don't think that those are fingerprints on the 80-S? They look more like they came from the bank sack. I think I've heard it called "textile toning?"
<< <i>Im not to smart on these things but I don't think that those are fingerprints on the 80-S? They look more like they came from the bank sack. I think I've heard it called "textile toning?" >>
Cool! Maybe that's why a gingerly attempt to remove them didn't really work. Under strong magnification they appear to be 'in' the coin and not on top of the mirrors. Perhaps ANACS will not penalize me too strongly.
peacockcoins
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
I almost forgot................YOU SUCK!!!!
Larry
Dabigkahuna