Why even bother with the picture?

Barry · October 24, 2004 10:16AM

Link

idocoins · October 24, 2004 10:17AM

jbsteven · October 24, 2004 10:27AM

ahh the old Space Shuttle shot.

mercurynut · October 24, 2004 10:52AM

earlwbollinger · October 24, 2004 11:59AM

Cool, I guess having a picture helps sell the item.
I guess No one the picture has to really be useable or not.

Russ · October 24, 2004 12:01PM

You know, that one may just be the worst I've ever seen.

Russ, NCNE

lava · October 24, 2004 1:16PM

Hilarious.

Myqqy · October 24, 2004 1:20PM

I found somebody who takes worse pictures than myself!

mrearlygold · October 24, 2004 1:21PM

But is it AT or NT ?

Where are the experts when you need them?

Tom

morgannut2 · October 24, 2004 1:29PM

No you guys are all wrong. The seller just imported some pictures of some early coppers from Heritage auction site and brightened them up.

Newmismatist · October 24, 2004 2:18PM

Hey this is a tough crowd - you can tell it's round! What more do you want?

- (and BTW those "copper" coins are definately

... well, round

ER · October 24, 2004 6:39PM

"My digital camera does not provide clear details."

eyoung429 · October 24, 2004 11:07PM

My digital camera does not provide clear details

Yeah? but I bet you could get a clear shot of the mars rover with that thing.....

kryptonitecomics · October 24, 2004 11:13PM

It looks like two halves of an oreo cookie?????

mgoodm3 · October 25, 2004 12:05AM

hit the "go to larger picture" link, that helps a lot.

Shamika · October 25, 2004 12:13AM

Looks cleaned.

1956Quarter · October 25, 2004 1:11AM

Thats almost as bad as having a picture of a goregeous example then implying that its a stock photo.

lordmarcovan · October 25, 2004 6:30AM

Hey, those aren't two half dimes- it's a pair of yeti eyeballs peering out of a snowbank!

...or something like that.

Comments