Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Some help on a 1999 Yankees team-signed bat

A collector is trying to repay a debt to me, in part, with a bat he describes as 1999 Yankees World Series. It is not a game bat, but it has 22 signatures. He says he acquired it at a Resorts International event in 2000 in Atlantic City, where signed memorabilia were sold for charity.

Obviously this bat must be sent to PSA/DNA before I can sell it and erase part of the debt, and the debtee knows that. Any idea how much it costs to authenticate a bat with 22 names? Any idea what the bat might sell for? You can tell I don't handle auto bats too much.

The sigs are Joe Torre, Derek Jeter, Roger Clemens, Bernie Williams, Mariano Rivera, Andy Pettitte, Jeff Nelson, Paul O'Neill, Shane Spencer, Chuck Knoblauch, Orlando Hernandez, Tino Martinez, David Cone, Jim Leyritz, Ramiro Mendoza, Chad Curtis, Scott Brosius, Jorge Posada, Chili Davis, Ricky Ledee, Luis Sojo, Darryl Strawberry.

Some of these are hard to make out because of illegible signature style, but a list was provided. No written provenance from the promoter of the event, but a name of someone at "Big League Marketing" who supplied the bat.

Of course the bat may be a fake, in which case it doesn't count toward the debt. But let's assume it's not for the moment. Any thoughts from the Bat-Cave?

Comments

  • If you send me a scan of bat, I can tell you if it is real or not. I have been collecting Yankee autos for over 30 years. I lived in Ft Lauderdale and go to Tampa every Spring training. gem10sports@sbcglobal.net

    Dave
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    I'll scan the bat as best I can, on a section with many sigs. I'll post here and send you a large scan. Thanks.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Here's scans of the barrel from three angles. It's only in focus through the center because I'm scanning a rounded surface. A very large version of the first scan is here

    image

    image

    image
  • It is def NOT real. Not even close.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Well, bad to hear but good to know. I won't waste money submitting it, then. Thanks extremely.
  • Going from your bottom picture. The sig in blue is supposed to be Posada. To the left is a very bad Nelson. To the left of that is not even close Pettitte. The Torre is very bad, along with Clemens.

    Dave
  • No problem. Glad I could help.
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    gem10sports,

    I diagree. SOME of the signatures look real to me and MIGHT be authentic. I also collect Yankees signatures and have a 1998 Yankees signed Steiner bat (limited to 125 for their number of wins in 1998) as well as a Goldin Sports (from SAH) autograhed baseball. The Rickey Ledee and Luis Sojo look like the autographs on my bat. I think I have gotten pretty good at detecting fakes but of course I am not 100% sure.


    jrdolan.

    Can you rotate the bat so I can see the Jeter signature?
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    gemmy: None of them look obviously like Jeter, if that's not it to the left of Brosius. What should I look for?

    gem10sports: You said Clemens is a fake. Which one is Clemens?

    Also, I guess it can't be a "World Series" bat, because under David Cone it says "PE (or PG) 7-18-99"

    Even if some of them ARE real, don't the fake ones make it worthless?

    Here's a scan of the remaining side, with El Duque. I still don't see Jeter.

    image
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    JR
    Jeter is a tough auto and not readable - you have him just to the right of the 33 IN - Professional Model
    type on the bat - his auto looks like circles that interconnect with each other.
    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Since the Joe Torre is isolated, I thought it would be interesting for everyone to look at his auto on the bat and compare with some on ebay - most of these look the same and are from auto cards which are pulls from sets:

    image
    image
    image
    image

    image

    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    image

    The one in blue is El Duke and the one to the left of El Duke is Chuck Knoblauch. Sorry, but happen to think they are real but obviously I am not 100% sure.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    El Duque's sig is probably the easiest to read, next to Torre's. Above Knobby, is that Paul O'Neill leaving out a few letters? And who in heck is to the right of El Duque? It looks like Jim Har-something.

    Gemmy, do you agree with gem10sports on others that he says are obviously fake?

    Also, and I repeat, if some are real and some are forged, isn't the whole bat rendered sorta useless?
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    The Joe Torre signature might be questionable. Not sure 100% about the Rogers Clemens either. The Luis Sojo, Chili Davis and Scott Brosius look like they are real (look like ones on my bat). The Derek Jeter might be to the right of "Professional Model" but I can't make out the whole signature. If you have time scan that portion of the bat.
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The Joe Torre signature might be questionable >>


    Gemmy
    I agree...I can not judge autos but that one looks entirely different to the ones on the cards...for one thing Torre uses even spacing of his letters which is not evident on the bat.
    As I said, the Jeter is to the right of the "professional model" type - here is a good exemplar:

    image

    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    Mike, Jeter's signature has changed a little since your card was issued. I have Jeter signatures on 4 differerent items, bat, jersey, baseball, and Yankee Master Collection card.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    OK, now that I know which one is Jeter, I scanned that specific section (below).

    I figured out what "PG 7-18-99" under Cone's sig means. PG = Perfect Game. I imagine he signed that way all year long after his Perfecto, so I guess it could have been signed after the Series.

    The r's in Torre look a bit different on the bat than they do on the flat items. Do people sign a bit differently on a rounded surface like a bat?

    Anyway, I don't want to spend $200 or whatever PSA/DNA will charge and have them say "Not Authentic."

    image
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    jrdolan, Looky Here:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=73391&item=5133223730&rd=1

    I think the Jeter sig looks like it could be authentic. The Mariano looks good too.

    You are right about the PG in Cone....I have seen him sign this way a lot for Steiner.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Thanks for the eBay link, Gemmy. I am no auto expert, but at first glance the sigs in that auction seem to match up pretty close to the ones on this bat (I haven't tried to compare them all). I still have no idea which one is Clemens. Is that the unreadable name with all the ascending loops in it?

    So we seem to have some difference of opinion. It now appears that at least some of these autos MAY be real. Would you invest the $$ to have PSA/DNA examine it? If even one name is deemed fake, will they reject the whole bat? You see my dilemma. Has anyone sent a multi-auto bat to them before?

  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    I wouldn't pay $200...I would buy a Steiner...then you would be sure.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    I don't want to buy a Yankee bat. The only reason I have this one is that someone gave it to me to help pay a debt. If I can't authenticate it and sell it, I will send it back. It is not to keep.
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    JR
    Here is a good Clemens ball to view - psa/dna authenticated.

    image
    Mike
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Thanks, Stone. I don't seem to have a sig like that on the bat. There's one that may be "Rogr" but the last name doesn't match your "Clemens" at all. In fact, it doesn't even look like it tries to spell Clemens. Hmm.
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    JR
    This is a tough bat...I think a lot of the sigs are real...so why forge the lesser people unless they were not all gotten at the same time and they figured no one would challenge a bat with bad common autos?
    Might be worth calling PSA and ask them how much to authenticate the bat. But, I kind of feel like you that if any of them are bad, the whole bat is not worth/fair selling.
    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    what a way to pay off a debt, guess the call to the irs was fruitless? sorry u have to go thru all this to get your dough.
    Good for you.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭


    << <i>what a way to pay off a debt, guess the call to the irs was fruitless? sorry u have to go thru all this to get your dough. >>


    Yes, but better than nothing. And he's repaying with other goods that are already graded and authenticated. Not enough to cover the debt, I expect. As for the IRS, there is a whole lot more to that story now. It turns out I didn't know this person at all. Some bad history I should have known about before having any dealings with him.

    Anyway, I agree with Stone. Why add fake Yankee autos to a bat that has real ones? Nobody is going to pay much for it without authentication. Much better to just leave it with the sigs that are real. This person knew I was going to send it to PSA/DNA and still gave it to me. I can add the PSA fee to the amount he owes me, but that's not much use if the bat is rejected.

    What would an authenticated '99 Yankees bat go for?
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>What would an authenticated '99 Yankees bat go for? >>


    I don't know about the bats but the ball would be worth about 900$ for a regular ball and about 1300-1500$ for a WS ball. I wouldn't be surprised to see where the bat could be worth in the 2+ grand range if authenticated by PSA/DNA IMO.
    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • Like I said before, the bat is Not real. Gemmy10, If you can not tell by just looking at the Jeter sig, not to mention the others, you should not be dicussing this at all. To the untrained eye, as I see you have, the person who forged this bat tried to add some of the same similarities, but they are way off. That is not a real Jeter sig. on that bat, along with the others. Yes, Jeter's sig has changed since being in the minors to present day, so you cannot go by that card. That is a real Jeter minor league sig. on that card scan Stone provided. But that is a very ugly, poor forged version of Jeters present day sig. Not even close.
    I am an expert on Yankee signatures. I have been collecting them for over 30 years, in person. From Mantle, Maris, Munson, DiMaggio to Jeter, Soriano, when they were Norwich Navigators, here in Ct. where I live, to the present sigs of Yankee players I obtain on my yearly trips to Tampa. Steve Grad and Spence at PSA/DNA know Im top notch, as I have pointed out to them, some ways of spotting fake Yankee sigs. Im not here to be negative to anyone. I was just helping out jrdolan as he ask for. I wish I could of given you better news, but its not real. You would be wasting your money.


    jrdolan- If you look at the first picture scan of bat you posted, Clemens is supposed to be in blue above Sojo in blue. Compare that to the Clemens on the baseball scan that was provided. It is noway real on bat.
    .
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    gem10sports, are you saying all of the signatures are fake? If so, I disagree with you. Most of the signatures are exactly like the ones on my Steiner bat.

    <<I am an expert on Yankee signatures>>

    Why don't you start an authentification service?
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think everyone here is making some good points and this is worthy of discussion since I, for one, always learn from them. I do think the Torre is not real and this is a very amateurish opinion - I think the bat most likely will come up with good and bad autos - JR is just trying to salvage a bad situation - so what is the final take home message? Either give the bat back or send it to be authenticated.
    JR - how about sending scans to PSA for a quick opinion to start - they will hopefully let you know whether the bat is worth submitting.
    Everyone take care and thanx
    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    I did send PSA a scan for a quick opinion. The reply was that they needed the bat to make any conclusive determination. I guess their point is that they don't do free "quickies" or informal appraisals.

    While there is disagreement about some of the autos, no one here is saying ALL of them look legit. I have a feeling that 22 sigs. on a bat is going to be pretty expensive to authenticate, and I suspect that even a single fake will ruin the whole bat. I'll send it back where it came from and ask for other, more salable goods.

    Thanks all for your opinions. I wish words didn't get heated, but I think it's been a good discussion. Maybe somebody has read this and won't buy a fake Clemens auto, for example, as a result.
  • ajwajw Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭
    If the bat is being offered to cover a debt, why don't you have the debtor sell the bat and give you the cash? He should make the effort and take the chance, not you.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    interesting thread. jr i guess the only thing for you to do is demand from this person only things that can be liqiudated easily. as for the bat i feel it is fruitless in trying to render an opinion simply from a scan. with that said ill add my opinion on it nontheless. i think it is prolly mostly fake. the reason for my feeling that way is since the person you got it from is considered shady what would make me think the bat isnt?

    good luck though with whatever u decide to do.


    as for psa/dna i have seen auctions where they have authenticated certain autos on an item and also deemed others as clubhouse etc.
    Good for you.
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    On old team-signed baseballs, it is quite common that all signatures except for one or two are genuine, and that the fake ones were clubhouse signatures. PSA/DNA and GAI will both authenticate those with an explicit notation as to which signatures were clubhouse creations. I have an old A.L. All-Star ball that is that way (the Mantle is a clubhouse signature that doesn't look close, while everyone else is real). It does devalue the item considerably (probably by at least half), but does not make it worthless to a lot of collectors.

    IMO, someone legitimately obtained as many of the signatures as they could on this bat, and then just filled in the rest.

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    Nick, I agree. Probably 75% of the signatures are real.
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Nick and Gemmy .... would you mind making a hologram and COA for me? Call it NAG Authenticating Inc. image

    Actually, I'm surprised PRO hasn't stuck its dirty little fingers into this pie yet. "Your sigs guaranteed authentic, or your money back!"

    Uh oh. Maybe I shouldn't have said that.
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Nick and Gemmy .... would you mind making a hologram and COA for me? >>


    image

    I agree with the others - this is a dubious "mixed" bat. BTW, I, probably like others, have done reading on the subject of authenticity just for the pleasure of understanding. One of the things that the experts look for when they look at the signature "live" is the "intentional" slowly drawn lettering, atypical letter slanting, irregular letter shape and formation as well as irregualr overlapping of strokes, and irregular spacing between letters - also sizing of letters disproportionate/exaggerated/undersized e.g.
    your friend
    Mike
    Mike

  • Link to real Jeter, Clemens auto

    null


    This is how Jeter, Clemens signed in 1999, 2000 to present day. As you can see they are nowhere near the sigs on the bat.

    Gemmy10- The first thing I look at when I see a Yankee teamed signed item is the Jeter sig. People who forge these signatures can never seem to get it correct. There are certain keys spots that I look for, that Stone was correct on. Slants, pen flow, preasure points. etc. You can disagree with me, if you want, about the other autos on bat. I dont have time to get into every signature on the bat with you. But the sigs are way off. If the Jeter, Clemens, Torre, Pettitte- big name autos on bat are not legit, then the bat would never pass authenticity. Its Not real. Im 100% positive on that.

    This post has gotten good. For those of you who do not know what goes into getting a signature PSA/DNA authenticated, heres what happens.

    1. You give them your autograped item
    2. They look at it. If they are familiar with it, they can usually tell right away. If they are not, they have examples of signatures on hand in there laptop computers. They try and match it up just like we are doing in this post. If it looks good, it passes. If it doesnt, it fails. There is nothing scientific about it. PRETTY SCARY HUH?
    3. By law PSA/DNA cannot say an auto is forged or fake. They can only say it does not pass their authenticity. If it doesnt pass, they keep your money. Even if the auto is real. YES PSA/DNA makes mistakes. Im not saying they are not good at what they do, but theirs noway to be perfect., servuices
    4. On their Letter Of Authenticity it states: Its in our opinion the auto's pen flow Mumbo Jumbo stuff.
    The key is ITS OUR OPINION. Thats all it is, their opinion.


    Because of the world we live in, full of people who want to scam others, services like this are needed. But people should not rely on this 100%. The best way is to get your auto in person yourself. Thats the only way to know100%. If you cant, find a dealer you can trust. They are out there. Ask questions, find out where, when, by who auto was obtained. Then you can use a service like PSA/DNA on top of that.

    Upper Deck has the only fool proof authenticity I have seen. The pen cam auto. They give you a disk of your actual item being signed. Gemmy10 states he has a Steiner Auto Yankee piece. But thats not 100% I have seen Steiner pieces that are not legit. All it is is a certificate with a hologram on the item that can be removed. Gemmy10, In no way am I saying yours is not legit, so please dont come back at me with that. I would like to see a picture of it, if you have one available.

    This is just the sports memorabilia business.

    I hope I have given you some insight on this.

    Dave






  • DirtyHarryDirtyHarry Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭
    JR - I am surprised that PSA/DNA wouldn't work with you to render a "quick opinion", for a fee of course, being that you are a CU member. I hit on the PSA/DNA page and it states that for $7.49, you can avail yourself of the quick opinion service on an existing Ebay listing.

    So here's an idea. Create a three day listing, BIN $5000, incorporate the multiple scans, then invoke the PSA/DNA quick opinion option and see what happens. Have your debtor pay the listing and opinion fees. Regards.
    Proud of my 16x20 autographed and framed collection - all signed in person. Not big on modern - I'm stuck in the past!
  • Gem10sports (Dave),

    Here are photos of my Jeter jersey and a portion of the bat. The shots of the Jeter signature on the jersey came out a little blurry because of the glass in the display case:

    image

    image
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    Dirty Harry -- a decent idea. I'd feel sleazy putting a suspicious bat up for auction, but still a decent idea if in the description I warned people not to actually bid.

    You know, guys, I really wasn't trying to start a fight over who knows Yankee autos best. I admit that I know them worst, not being an auto collector (other than Bench, of which I have about two dozen authenticated). As for the Yanks, those guys should write more legibly!
  • Stone193Stone193 Posts: 24,409 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>You know, guys, I really wasn't trying to start a fight over who knows Yankee autos best. I admit that I know them worst, not being an auto collector (other than Bench, of which I have about two dozen authenticated). As for the Yanks, those guys should write more legibly! >>


    JR
    It's all in good fun.
    BTW, the Sox won tonite with 4 errors again - perhaps this is their year!
    Take care
    your friend
    Mike
    Mike
  • Gemmy10 When and where did you purchase these? The bat has Jeters 1996-1998 sig More towards 1996. The Jersey looks to be 1999-2000. Looks like he signed the jersey very small. Now you can tell the Mendoza, T Martinez, Rivera, Girardi autos are def. real.

    Dave
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    Thanks, Dave. The bat is a 1998 LE to 125. The jersey I purchased in 1999 and is an official Russell WS jersey. It has the 1999 World Series patch as well as the navy blue band around the sleeve and #5 in memoriam for Joe DiMaggio. I bought it on eBay and it came with a Steiner COA but I at the time of the purchase I called Steiner just to be sure that the seller on eBay was a customer of Steiner and it was legit. The seller had an additional patch on the front of the jersey which says Derek Jeter AL ROY 1996, World Champions 96-98-99. It was limited to 22 (BIG DEAL). You are right the signature on the jersey is not very large, but large enough.

    Do the Jeter signatures on the bat and jersey look real to you? They do to me. I also have a Yankee UD Master Collection Jeter auto card as well as a Joe DiMaggio Commemorative baseball (Goldin Sports) signed by the 1998 Yankees, and both of the Jeter signatures look like the jersey and bat.
  • Gemmy- Yes the Jeters are real. I was real close on the years. I have been dealing along time with Jeter sigs. The sig on the jersey is closer to the way Jeter signs now. He is signing just alittle different. Most my yankee signed items I have gotten in person, as I have told you, I attend Yankee spring training in Tampa every year. I did buy a collection from a person, broke it up and sold it, and ended up with a Yankee 2000 WS celabration 16x20 signed by everyone (Steiner) for free. I really like the Jeter signed Master card you have.

    Dave
  • gem10sports, your 2000 WS Celebration reminded me I forgot to mention my
    1999 WS 16x20 photograph which is one of myt favorites since it's done in
    Silver Sharpie which looks real neat. It's also Goldin. I probably got ripped
    off from SAH because I was naive at the time and didn't know about eBay.
    I think I paid $900. Are Goldin's pieces always legit? Signatures look the
    same as my bat, jersey, and baseball.

    My kids got Mariano's signature on a official MLB baseball at Yankee stadium
    as well as Steve Karsay.

    My daughter and son would love to meet and get Derek Jeter's autograph someday
    but I never see him giving autos at Yankee stadium. Do you know if he does?

    My friend lives in Tampa and in 1997 we went to a Spring Training game. It seems
    like it is a lot eaier to get autos there as players are more relaxed but Spring Training
    does not coincide with my children's spring break.

    image

    image
  • Gemmy- Your Goldin Yankee auto 16x20 is 100% real. Most the Goldin stuff I have seen is fine. But just like any auto piece, whether it be Steiner or whoever, can be tampered with. I have seen alot of Mickey Mantle autos from Scoreboard that are not legit. Its a 50-50 crap shoot with them. Those Mantle fakes are real good. Very hard to tell.

    I never see Jeter sign too much at Yankee stadium. If he does its only a few. He does sign quite a few down in Tampa. He is very nice and handles the fans great. Mariano is always signing. Hes great. Arod is the worst! I also attend a Yankee luncheon every year down in Tampa. Its very hectic, but I enjoy it and get great sigs. Even there Arod has a puss on his face. Prob cause its for charity, and hes not getting paid for his oh so precious auto! LOL!!! It used to be great in Tampa, but every year it gets harder and harder to get signatures. Not like the old time Yankee greats! Its a great vacation for me and I love collecting autos. Its cool because you can be out to dinner and Jeter can be a few booths away from you. You see alot of Yankees out and about. I never bother them out away from the field though. Its their time.

    Dave

  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    Dave, when I was in Tampa in 1997 for a spring training game the following day we went to the Tampa Zoo. Darryl Strawberry was there with his wife and kids and we were tempted to ask him for his autograph but we decided not to bother him. My 5 year old son and 3 year old daughter were wearing their Yankee caps so we probably could have tried. A few years ago we went to Old timers Day. It was in August and also Bat Day. It was so hot (100 deg.) and humid that day that the players did not take bating practice, but Mariano started in right field and went all away to the dugout giving autographs. He must had signed 1,000 bats. What a GREAT guy as well as player!
  • jrdolanjrdolan Posts: 2,549 ✭✭
    This is more like it. image

    As for the suspect bat, it's going back to its owner. Thanks for the comments, everyone.
Sign In or Register to comment.