Grade this Morgan

skier07

I know it's tough to grade a coin from an image but please give this a shot.




linker





Bruce

nwcs

If uncirc, ms-62 max.

K6AZ

AU58 or MS62, I'd have to get a much better look to tell for sure. It's no 63.

DennisH

I'm with K6AZ on this... it's either a 58 or a 62, and my first gut reaction to seeing the picture was 58.

dimples

Sure why send them to the big guys for grading when they either agree or give BETTER grades to your SEGS coins. He makes absolutely no sense in his ad. Thus AU58

JRH

Hard to see clearly ...... my guess 62 ..... (but as Dennis Miller says .... "of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong").

morgannut2

There's maybe a $5.00 difference between a 62 and 63 so the coin might have a shot at a "market grade" of MS-63 just because both services( in my limited experience) sometimes seem to go easy on lower value coins where you shelled out a high percent of the value in grading cost. (of course I assume SEGS can tell an AU coin when they look)

Dog97

I think the big gouge on the cheek near jaw will limit it to 62 or less.

ziggy29

Agreed with the others. It's either a 58 or a 62, IMO. I'm betting 62 because the TPGs aren't afraid to assign a higher grade for a coin like this, where a 62 has very little extra value over a 58. If this is an '84-S, '96-O, '97-O or '01-P, for example, it's much more likely to come back in a 58 holder.

[edited to fix grammatical errors]

poorguy

Judging by the fact that 90% of his auction is defending SEGS and harly mentions the coin at all, one would suspect that this coin may be overgraded but would have to see it to be sure. If a seller really has to spend this much time defending why he chose a certain grading service, I don't think I'd want to put my money on it.