Do you think this might go CAM?? new pics added

Smitty79 · October 20, 2004 10:13AM

'62 Washington

Russ · October 20, 2004 10:16AM

Looks like it has a very real shot. Reverse, no doubt. Obverse iffy.

Russ, NCNE

lordmarcovan · October 20, 2004 10:17AM

Pictures are loading slower'n'ell here, but the thumbnails I did see make it look like a maybe-CAM to me. I don't see enough frost for a maybe-DCAM.

nwcs · October 20, 2004 10:19AM

Borderline. I think it's CAM-

XpipedreamR · October 20, 2004 10:19AM

I'd have to say no if the obverse really looks like that. It's a nice, light cameo, but no cigar. I only wish my slabbed Washington proofs that looked like that said CAM on the holder...

Myqqy · October 20, 2004 10:23AM

I would also be doubtful due to the obverse........

Smitty79 · October 20, 2004 10:25AM

Thanks for the comments. I'll try to get better pics once it comes in. I figured it would be worth a shot, so here's hoping. **fingers crossed**

Cameonut · October 20, 2004 10:25AM

IMO - the reverse is a no-brainer. The obverse is a PR+ or a Cam- at PCGS. Therefore a gamble at PCGS. I do think it would cam at NGC.
Cameonut

lordmarcovan · October 20, 2004 10:30AM

It'd DCAM at PCI, and cost a lot less to submit, too!

Dog97 · October 20, 2004 10:32AM

According to the picture the obv is brilliant with little frost so no on the CAM designation.

100proof1957 · October 20, 2004 10:42AM

NGC its a CAM
PCGS is a maybe
Question is,is it worth the cost to submit it ?
in 65 ya break even !

i agree with NUT

robertpr · October 20, 2004 10:53AM

I seriously doubt it would cam at either service.

JoeBoat · October 21, 2004 4:03AM

The cameo on the portrait looks iffy. Do the letters have any cameo frosting on them?

JAM

Smitty79 · October 21, 2004 4:15AM

<< <i>The cameo on the portrait looks iffy. Do the letters have any cameo frosting on them?

JAM

>>

Don't know yet, I don't have it, but judging from the pics I'd say it does. The only deciding factor is the portrait.

Craton · October 21, 2004 4:20AM

NGC certainly and PCGS maybe. As others have mentioned, the obverse looks kind of weak compared to the reverse.

oreville · October 21, 2004 6:54AM

NGC: slight possibility.

PCGS: No way.

Obverse is not cameo.

rlawsha · October 21, 2004 6:59AM

I have nothing to say

Smitty79 · October 26, 2004 12:03PM

Well, it came in today. Nice coin with even, unbroken frost on both sides. Some haze on the mirrors but I don't think it will have much problem going CAM, but no DCAM.

Russ · October 26, 2004 12:13PM

Good looking coin, and certainly worth what you paid and more.

Russ, NCNE

Do you think this might go CAM?? new pics added

Comments

Leave a Comment

Do you think this might go CAM?? *new pics added*

Comments

Leave a Comment

Do you think this might go CAM?? new pics added