Home Sports Talk

Bucs i mean sucs 1-5!!

Wow 2 first rounders 2 second rounders for john gruden! 1-5 now! sure he won the big game with tonys team! barry switzer did the same with jimmy's team! what a bust for the bucs!

Comments

  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    The Rams are supposed to be the best team in the NFC? They needed the refs to win this one tonight, so
    many blown calls I lost count. We were scoring all over the place with our 3rd stringer and a rookie WR.

    JS
  • 1-5...and still not even out of the race.
    Bucs are getting it together. Just some bad breaks tonight. That pittman fumble was bs...if our guys hang on to the ball we win. And i feel bad for clayton...Kid always plays his heart out and losers like Tim Brown and Pitmann ruin it for him.
    Real recognize REAL
    image


  • << <i>The Rams are supposed to be the best team in the NFC? >>



    Says who?

    I think they go either 10-6 or 9-7 and limp into the playoffs

    Face it, turnovers kill games especially 14 point turnover when pittman got mugged.

    Now quit being a coward and answer my question, so by choke you thought the seahawks would win over the pats?

    Brian
  • HA HA, Buc's are getting it together, how much more time are they gonna need?image
    Culpepper to ?, only God knows at this point!
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    Brian

    So you are seahalks fan this week? Man its hard to keep up with this. If you want to show you are a good team
    you can't go to New England and let Dillion run all over you and get blown out. You all didn't even show up!
    You choked! You had the Rams and they killed you! Patsies too

    I hope that helps!

    JS
  • I'm a fan of football and I've posted about 50 times now that MY team is the Falcons. How much clearer do I have to make it?

    I, unlike you, do not go on LSD induced rants about how 31 teams in the NFL completely suck and my team is supreme. The Seahawks totally 100% choked against the Rams, we're on the same page there. However, the Seahawks did NOT choke against the Pats because they shouldn't have won that game nor did they ever lead that game! If the Pats had lost, that WOULD have been a choke.

    I'm tired of you using "choke" out of context. You do know what choke means right?

    LMK

    Brian
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    Brian

    Pick one team and move on, it isn't my fault that sometimes your team of the week chokes. If Seattle wants
    people to take them for real then they need to show up against the good teams too, and not just go 8-0
    in their back yard, beat the Browns and Bears, squeak into the playoffs and then get blown up.....they
    aren't a real team.

    Is there any team out there who would want to play the Bucs over the Hawks right now?

    JS


  • << <i>Brian

    Pick one team and move on, it isn't my fault that sometimes your team of the week chokes. If Seattle wants
    people to take them for real then they need to show up against the good teams too, and not just go 8-0
    in their back yard, beat the Browns and Bears, squeak into the playoffs and then get blown up.....they
    aren't a real team.

    Is there any team out there who would want to play the Bucs over the Hawks right now?

    JS >>



    You're the one who need to pick a team and move on. All the teams you obsess over (Vikings, Seahawks, Pats, Eagles, Giants, Falcons?) are better than your sorry team. You need to realize that there are 32 teams in football and 31 don't suck.

    From what I've seen,

    1st tier (top teams) Eagles Pats (offense AND defense)

    2nd tier - Colts Vikings (offensive firepower)

    3rd tier - AFC - Jets Broncos Jags Steelers NFC - Seahawks Falcons Rams Giants

    I believe most of these teams will make the playoffs.

    I'd vote teams would rather play the Bucs over the Seahawks, but I'd like to poll the audience image

    Brian
  • If this diatribe wasn't pathetic enough already....to dissect a totally meaningless game with no bearing on any playoff except tp bring JS further to the truth known by any here who can drink without dribbling....The SUX do just that, excuses and all.

    Its over Joe...its over!

    Anyway, how could any normal person watch that trash when two baseball classics were being played....thats like watching Heidi when The Terminator was on.
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    funny I don't see a lot of rings in those tiers! I also see alot of teams that we punked including the entire
    NFC East.

    Here is what I see:

    Patsies...good but not tested on the road yet.

    Eagles...yes good but they are chokers and Reid and McNabb can't win the big one

    Vikes...no defense and now no moss, they are dead, look for another 2003 meltdown

    Colts....Better than the Vikes but still have no D. Manning, Harrison, Wayne, Edgerrin...awesome but they need
    to score 40 a game to keep up

    Broncos...pretenders
    Giants...see Broncos
    Rams...were not impressed tonight
    Falcons...Vick is not durable...and then what? Simeon is going to break him in half!! Matt Schaub anyone? LMAO

    There you go

    JS


  • << <i>we punked >>



    You're living in 2002.



    << <i>Here is what I see: >>



    Alright then genius, please tell me who the best teams are? I named a playoff scenario, do you even know football well enough to name one?

    Brian
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    the best teams now? sure, Patsies and Eagles, but that doesn't mean squat....its a 17 week season!

    Im just stating the obvious..Vick is soft, Philly chokes, and Seattle has no rings...whats wrong with that?

    JS
  • You ask Joe to make a playoff scenario, he can't, he only thinks one team is good enough to make the playoffs, and that team is currently 1-5. I think the only way were gonna get through to him is if we have John Gruden call him up and tell him that it's not 2002 anymore. Even then I'm not sure he would snap out of it.
    Culpepper to ?, only God knows at this point!
  • BTW, if the Broncos are "pretenders", a team that just slaughtered Oakland 31-3 in Oakland, what in God's name does that make your team, a team the got slaughtered BY Oakland 30-20?

    LMK

    Brian
  • Gemmy10Gemmy10 Posts: 2,990
    Oh, yeah. They indeed suck. joey?
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    playoff scenerio? Who cares, just win rings, you want me to tell you all the teams that will choke
    in the playoffs??

    The broncos are NOT a good team, they have played soft teams and have looks plain silly at times. Besides the
    bucs, they have played one other good team and they put up only 6 points against them! Raiders, Panthers
    Chargers, Cheifs.....can you say soft?

    Any other questions?

    JS


  • << <i>playoff scenerio? Who cares, just win rings, you want me to tell you all the teams that will choke
    in the playoffs??

    The broncos are NOT a good team, they have played soft teams and have looks plain silly at times. Besides the
    bucs, they have played one other good team and they put up only 6 points against them! Raiders, Panthers
    Chargers, Cheifs.....can you say soft?

    Any other questions?

    JS >>



    Good stuff here! The Raiders were "soft" enough to be in your sig for a few weeks image . And you say that Jax is good (which I agree with) how can you say that SD is bad - a team that thrashed Jax?

    Brian
  • joestalinjoestalin Posts: 12,473 ✭✭
    one teams dominates the other and then is dominated by a team that blew the first one out....LOL

    I think you just answered your own question!

    JS

    PS..If you need help, LMK

  • Doppelganger posted :
    "Anyway, how could any normal person watch that trash when two baseball classics were being played....thats like watching Heidi when The Terminator was on."

    If Football is on, then the Baseball that's on is for sissys and little old women.
    Dopp, hopefully you're a sissy, because I'd hate to think of you as a little old lady.
    Of course, if you're really into muscle man movies then maybe you've already answered the question.







  • << <i>Doppelganger posted :
    "Anyway, how could any normal person watch that trash when two baseball classics were being played....thats like watching Heidi when The Terminator was on."

    If Football is on, then the Baseball that's on is for sissys and little old women.
    Dopp, hopefully you're a sissy, because I'd hate to think of you as a little old lady.
    Of course, if you're really into muscle man movies then maybe you've already answered the question. >>



    Actually, Klownie, I think you answered the question.....the question?

    Who is the most moronic poster on CU even managing to make JS look brilliant and BKAH a pale comparison in the realm of being politically incorrect.

    Hmmmm..did a little research on you Klownie as you brought out that particular venom I have for idiocy.

    First point of disqualification:

    YOU POST ON THE OPEN FORUM

    That in and of itself is grounds for instant disqualification of anything you could ever say....poster and reader of the "Open Forum"...you have no life Morlock.

    You bash Gays and label Black people Sub-human....read your posts there.....nuff said yet genius??

    How about this......you seem all too infatuated with the word gay....maybe its time you emerge from the closet and not project your psychodrama onto a perfect label for watching a meaningless Football game in preference to the extra inning melodramas of the greatest sport on Earth, Baseball.

    Oh....one more thing...add LOSER to your user name...it fits.image
  • One thing is for sure, the Bucs are the BEST 1-5 team out there image

    Need a RB??? Minny could use pretty much any of your D...



    LMK

    Beef
    Am I speaking Chinese?



    image
Sign In or Register to comment.