New Set Registry opinions on these o/c qualifiers
zsz70
Posts: 541 ✭
What is your opinion on this ?
The 1973 opc baseball set has 3
PSA 9 Roberto Clementes.
They are ALL PSA 9 o/c
This card is impossible to find centered.
There are NO 9's without qualifiers.
1973 opc baseball is one of the toughest opc
years to find nice centered cards.
Should there be a penalty on the set registry
for this type of card ?
Why should this card drop to a 7 when there
is no 9 that exists ?
A PSA 9 o/c Clemente is quite honestly
the highest possible grade to get from this card outside of a straight 8?
I'm 99.9 % sure that I will see my grave
before I will see an unqualified 9.
The 1973 opc baseball set has 3
PSA 9 Roberto Clementes.
They are ALL PSA 9 o/c
This card is impossible to find centered.
There are NO 9's without qualifiers.
1973 opc baseball is one of the toughest opc
years to find nice centered cards.
Should there be a penalty on the set registry
for this type of card ?
Why should this card drop to a 7 when there
is no 9 that exists ?
A PSA 9 o/c Clemente is quite honestly
the highest possible grade to get from this card outside of a straight 8?
I'm 99.9 % sure that I will see my grave
before I will see an unqualified 9.
0
Comments
Joe
I understand your question with the 73 OPC. I know how bad it sucks to track down decent ones - I've slowed down my Ryan set a little, but I'm always looking for OPC stuff. It just makes finding decent ones (of which I have ONE I plan to grade, a 74 knock on wood it will come back slabbed) that much better.
That said, I would actually prefer a nice PSA 8 that presents really well to a PSA 9OC where the centering pops out at you. For example, here's my '73 OPC Stargell:
JEB.