Dipping 40% Halves -
clackamas
Posts: 5,615 ✭
Kennedy guys I need some advice.
I have 2 ultra nice MS67 candidate 1968-D halves but the obverses have a milky haze from the mint sets they came from. Do I dip them or will PCGS not downgrade and be happy I left the surfaces intact?
Thanks
I have 2 ultra nice MS67 candidate 1968-D halves but the obverses have a milky haze from the mint sets they came from. Do I dip them or will PCGS not downgrade and be happy I left the surfaces intact?
Thanks
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>PCGS will knock them a point or so. They love luster on these, and the film dulls it.
Russ, NCNE >>
Will that mint set film come off?
Of course if they are ultra nice MS67 then dip them because: luster is good. Dipping should remove the haze.
<< <i>I believe they look at the edge of the coin on clad to see if the copper layer is pink, be careful--------BigE >>
These are 40% silver and the dip, so far, has not changed the clad color.
I dipped both coins. 1 is now a 66 and the other still has some mil spots but the coin does look much better and is near perfect and has much better luster. I am still debating if it was worth it.
Russ, NCNE
I agree, a 67 would be a score. I have gone through, 15 original rolls, and 50 mint sets and I am still not convinced I have one. I have 7 I am going to send in. Only 1 coin, I believe has a shot and I am setting it up with the others. I have mad some Nice Ken in the past few months, the POP 1 (oops now a POP2), MS68, 2004-P so far in the best
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>I went through 72 rolls between the 1964 and 1964-D coins and found two MS66's, and four MS65's. Most were just beat up junk. The mint was not very careful in their handling back in those days. The 1969-D I made in MS66 was a crackout/dip from an NGC MS66 holder.
Russ, NCNE >>
69-D is a much tougher date than the 68-D for some reason. I was born in 68 so that is the root of my obsession.
Russ and clackamas were right when it comes to BU 1968-D Kennedy halves BU means beat up.