Please grade this 1916-S saint

sadysta1 · October 4, 2004 10:07AM

Input your guess here

pic1

pic2

JxnBoy · October 4, 2004 10:09AM

63

coinkat · October 4, 2004 10:13AM

nice looking coin HIGH END MS64

jdimmick · October 4, 2004 10:14AM

Pic is very tuff to grade by, especially on a Saint. Ill say Au-58. Looks to be slight wear/flatness on high points from light circ, if not an it is MS then Ms-63?

Sequitur · October 4, 2004 10:14AM

63-64 are good guesses, pics are a little blurry for the size.

JxnBoy · October 4, 2004 10:15AM

Allow me to add:

Reverse looks 65 or 66. Obverse has too much impaired luster for me to say anything over 63. Might be the pic, though.

Bear · October 4, 2004 10:40AM

I would say MS-64

darktone · October 4, 2004 11:06AM

au58 but I must add I think these are hard to grade from pictures. mike

sadysta1 · October 4, 2004 12:01PM

it's SEGS MS63, I'm thinking about crossing it

RYK · October 4, 2004 12:09PM

I think it will cross.

ziggy29 · October 4, 2004 7:53PM

<< <i>it's SEGS MS63, I'm thinking about crossing it >>

If there's no trace of wear to 58 it on you, I'd think it should cross at 63.

Cam40 · October 4, 2004 9:35PM

Looks like a gem.
I,ll go 65 for my wag.
Nice.

saintguru · October 4, 2004 10:28PM

All depends on the surfaces...whether it's been tampered with, jewelers cloth, etc. If it hasn't it should cross from the scans, but scans lie...in both directions!

AValde · October 4, 2004 11:24PM

MS 61

mgoodm3 · October 5, 2004 1:39AM

64

fountainheadgold · October 5, 2004 9:33AM

ms65

Betta285 · October 5, 2004 9:39AM

i can identify the atomic mass of an element better than i can grade saints..but i'd say 65??

jim

Please grade this 1916-S saint

Comments

Leave a Comment