If you saw this Morgan raw, would you think it was AT?

dan1ecu · October 1, 2004 2:43AM

Here it is... I don't own it:

1882-S Morgan (toned)

Dan

kryptonitecomics · October 1, 2004 2:45AM

No. It looks bag tonned to me.....NT all the way

paigowjohnny · October 1, 2004 2:55AM

I might have second thoughts if I saw it raw...but then the colors don't look so harsh as to be an obvious AT job...

Steve27 · October 1, 2004 2:55AM

No, the AT Morgans are usually more vibrant and have color on both sides. The one would be slabbed by all the grading companies.

nwcs · October 1, 2004 3:10AM

I'd be a little cautious. I'd like to see it in person.

dorkkarl · October 1, 2004 3:11AM

almost certainly.

however, i would consider it mkt-acceptable.

K S

Betta285 · October 1, 2004 3:27AM

Raw, i would probably view it as NT with of course the little bit of speculation in my mind. As others said, the colors aren't as vibrant or radical that they would make someone think AT.

jim

LincolnCentMan · October 1, 2004 3:30AM

The coin looks 99% NT to me. I have yet to see a coin that I felt was AT that have areas of white that shadow the stars and date. That is one of the diagnostics of a NT coin.

David