ACC MS67 = PCGS MS67

Craton

Maybe not in all instances. This was the first ACC certified coin that I have ever seen. I purchased it for the toning and cracked it out and sent it to PCGS and it came back the same grade.

sliderider

Nice crack out. I have an ACC 1950 Proof dime that I will be submitting soon. I know it won't cross, ACC said it was PF 70 and PCGS hasn't certified anything over 67 yet, but I'll be happy just to have it in a PCGS slab, no matter what the grade.

ChuckC

does ACC have a website?

Craton

<< <i>does ACC have a website? >>


I don't know if they do or not. I purchased it from this seller who seems to sell a lot of them:
LINKY
I'm thinking that the seller might be "ACC". I'm certainly not suggesting that everyone run out and buy from this guy, I'm just showing the nickel that I had that crossed over the same grade.

sliderider

Same seller I got my dime from.

Myqqy

I've been wondering how accurately "hucky" grades his own stuff..... I keep looking for cameo franklins in his listings, but so far have not found anything with enough cameo contrast.......

ccex

I've had OK experiences with this seller, but I've only bought 3 raw, circulated hoins from him. Yes "ACC" is his house brand slab.

jom

Maybe it is the picture but that coin looks hideous. It looks lack-luster and the toning specs don't help. I'm surprised PCGS went 67 on this.....do you have a picture of this in the PCGS slab?

jom

Craton

<< <i>Maybe it is the picture but that coin looks hideous. It looks lack-luster and the toning specs don't help. I'm surprised PCGS went 67 on this.....do you have a picture of this in the PCGS slab?

jom >>



That is in the PCGS slab. Do you want to see the lable or??

dorkkarl

looks like a wonderfully original coin to me. i like it a lot!

GREAT JOB!

K S

Craton

Craton

<< <i>Maybe it is the picture but that coin looks hideous. It looks lack-luster and the toning specs don't help. I'm surprised PCGS went 67 on this.....do you have a picture of this in the PCGS slab?

jom >>



Heylow? Image posted.

JrGMan2004

VERY Cool Jason!! Me likes the color... it's different... but somehow attracting... I like how Jeff tones in different ways from other coins... Especially proofs that have one color devices, another color in the field... like gold devices and purple fields!

Craton

<< <i>VERY Cool Jason!! Me likes the color... it's different... but somehow attracting... I like how Jeff tones in different ways from other coins... Especially proofs that have one color devices, another color in the field... like gold devices and purple fields! >>



Thanks, I like it too. You know, I have never really thought about all of the different colors that Jefferson tone. I know for a fact that I have seen Jeffersons in many different colors and if I sit here and think of other series of coins, I don't think that I have seen any that compare to the different colors that you can find Jeffersons in. I'm not saying that this is fact, it's just been my experience ...... and I don't get out much so that's not saying much

Iwog

Maybe it is the picture but that coin looks hideous. It looks lack-luster and the toning specs don't help. I'm surprised PCGS went 67 on this

You're forgetting that all the major grading services totally ignore luster. I wonder how many excellent examples we need before this is widely accepted?