Home U.S. Coin Forum

1893s and 1881cc coins back from PCGS

I posted I got these back a few days ago just got coins today here are the pics.imageimageimageimage
"Freedom of speech is a great thing.Just because you can say anything does not mean you should.

Comments

  • Wow. The '93-S sure looks better than a 15.
    J.C.
    *******************************************************************************

    imageimageSee ya on the other side, Dudes. image
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>



    It sure does. Maybe it got netted for a light cleaning.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Nice looking CC!. I think PCGS was being a little stingy.
    image

    My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)

    JDRF Donation
  • Hey twodogs!! I thought so myself, I thought at least VF. I guess ya can't win em all.
    "Freedom of speech is a great thing.Just because you can say anything does not mean you should.


  • << <i>Wow. The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>

    My thoughts exactly.image
  • It's hard to tell from the pic, but there sure looks like there's a separation between the two cotton leaves and both of the eagle's wings seem to have nice definition for a 15.

    Maybe what Russ said...netted for light cleaning...
    J.C.
    *******************************************************************************

    imageimageSee ya on the other side, Dudes. image
  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Vet: Nice coins and nice grades. What grades were you expecting to receive on those coins?

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • Russ I thought PCGS wouldn't grade cleaned coins. I was told they grade the coin by its worst side ,whitch is the obv on this coin, I am sure the rev is VF and I was hoping to come back with a VF.

    Stuart I was going VF on the 93s and 64 with a shot at 65 on the 81cc
    "Freedom of speech is a great thing.Just because you can say anything does not mean you should.
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,991 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 93-S looks like a VF30 to me; I suspect the light cleaning theory is a good one.

    The 81-CC looks extremely nice for a 64.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,148 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Russ I thought PCGS wouldn't grade cleaned coins. I was told they grade the coin by its worst side ,whitch is the obv on this coin, I am sure the rev is VF and I was hoping to come back with a VF. >>

    On rarer dates and older issues, they become a little lenient with problems and will lower the grade a bit. For example, an early copper with AU50 details and a bit of corrosion (light, mind you, not super heavy) may grade XF45, but won't be bagged. A 1950 Lincoln, thought, with any corrosion, will get bagged every day.

    Jeremy
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • I think PCGS graded both of those coins conservatively - I can live with the grades - but there's meat left on the bones - those coins should get a premium above Grey Sheet when (or if) they sell.
  • Based on your scans, I would have guessed 65 on the 81-CC and VF20 on the 93-S.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Russ I thought PCGS wouldn't grade cleaned coins. >>



    If they suspect a very light cleaning, they will sometimes holder the coin and drop the grade a touch. NGC does the same thing.

    Russ, NCNE
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295


    << <i>

    << <i>The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>



    It sure does. Maybe it got netted for a light cleaning.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    That's exactly what happened. Detail wise, that coin is a VF20-25.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with all of the above comments and want to add that the 81cc is really an upper end 64 and based on those pics worth 65 money.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • That 81cc could easily be ms65
    Michael
  • Would the die crack running from S in states to E in america have held the 81cc at 64?
    "Freedom of speech is a great thing.Just because you can say anything does not mean you should.
  • dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    PCGS could not possible have net graded that 93-S, they don't holder problem coins do they?? Can I lightly clean my proof state quarters and get them holdered, of course not. PCGS must have been in 'ultra tight' mode that week.......try 'em again in a couple months, both grades could easily change.

    And remember, grading is not an exact science, opinions can differ even among experts, and the same 'expert' may assign a different grade to the same coin at any given point in time.
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    As for the 93-S, I think there's too much wear on the turkey's wings for a VF designation, but you got robbed on the 81-CC. That's a super coin for a CC Morgan.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The die crack on the 81-CC should have nothing to do with the difference between a 64 or 65. It is an attractive coin and I would rather see the coin rather than speculate as to the reasons for a 4.

    The 1893-S is alittle more problematic...(for me anyway). While the wear is consistent with a VF20 grade, the coin really has been dipped and has been stripped of its originality. Not to be critical, but even though a F15 may not be what you hoped for, it is better than a Body Bag. If the coin were original, it would probably fetch a good $2,000 more than in its "conserved" state. The best news is that the 1893-s is definately not counterfeit.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Congratulations on getting both of these slabbed! image I agree that the 1893-S is VF+, but lightly cleaned. I think the 1881-CC is correctly graded. BTW, my 1881-CC is PCGS MS64 and my 1893-S is PCGS AG03. The 1881-CC is my favorite coin in this series, as she usually comes fully struck with blinding luster.
    Author of MrKelso's official cheat thread words of wisdom on 5/30/04. image
    imageimage
    Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
  • SethChandlerSethChandler Posts: 1,705 ✭✭✭✭
    Eat some fried chicken, don't lick your fingers, then thumb the 93-S, that will tone it down a bit. Whalla!!!! You've bumped the grade by a few points........VF25.

    Seth
    Collecting since 1976.
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,530 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Wow. The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>





    << <i>The 93-S looks like a VF30 to me; I suspect the light cleaning theory is a good one. >>



    Dang, I must be a tough customer, or just not up to speed on my Morgans (a distinct possibility). I would've 12'ed that.

    Neat coins, though, and that 81-CC shore is purty.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file