1893s and 1881cc coins back from PCGS
Vet
Posts: 1,513
I posted I got these back a few days ago just got coins today here are the pics.
"Freedom of speech is a great thing.Just because you can say anything does not mean you should.
0
Comments
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
<< <i>The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>
It sure does. Maybe it got netted for a light cleaning.
Russ, NCNE
My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)
JDRF Donation
<< <i>Wow. The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>
My thoughts exactly.
Maybe what Russ said...netted for light cleaning...
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
Stuart
Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal
"Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
Stuart I was going VF on the 93s and 64 with a shot at 65 on the 81cc
The 81-CC looks extremely nice for a 64.
<< <i>Russ I thought PCGS wouldn't grade cleaned coins. I was told they grade the coin by its worst side ,whitch is the obv on this coin, I am sure the rev is VF and I was hoping to come back with a VF. >>
On rarer dates and older issues, they become a little lenient with problems and will lower the grade a bit. For example, an early copper with AU50 details and a bit of corrosion (light, mind you, not super heavy) may grade XF45, but won't be bagged. A 1950 Lincoln, thought, with any corrosion, will get bagged every day.
Jeremy
<< <i>Russ I thought PCGS wouldn't grade cleaned coins. >>
If they suspect a very light cleaning, they will sometimes holder the coin and drop the grade a touch. NGC does the same thing.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>
It sure does. Maybe it got netted for a light cleaning.
Russ, NCNE >>
That's exactly what happened. Detail wise, that coin is a VF20-25.
And remember, grading is not an exact science, opinions can differ even among experts, and the same 'expert' may assign a different grade to the same coin at any given point in time.
The 1893-S is alittle more problematic...(for me anyway). While the wear is consistent with a VF20 grade, the coin really has been dipped and has been stripped of its originality. Not to be critical, but even though a F15 may not be what you hoped for, it is better than a Body Bag. If the coin were original, it would probably fetch a good $2,000 more than in its "conserved" state. The best news is that the 1893-s is definately not counterfeit.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
Seth
<< <i>Wow. The '93-S sure looks better than a 15. >>
<< <i>The 93-S looks like a VF30 to me; I suspect the light cleaning theory is a good one. >>
Dang, I must be a tough customer, or just not up to speed on my Morgans (a distinct possibility). I would've 12'ed that.
Neat coins, though, and that 81-CC shore is purty.