Home PCGS Set Registry Forum

Hey Russ...others..PCGS Prices

Howdy howdy

Easy question image

I went to look up some Kennedy Prices on the PCGS web-site and I noticed that they do not have prices for PR69 and PR70s?

Maybe I was looking in the wrong area.

This is the link to the page I was looking at -
http://www.pcgs.com/prices/frame.chtml?type=date&filename=kennedy_half_mod

Do I need to subscribe to get the other prices or.....? image

Thanks for any help

Beau
I love coins...image

Comments

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    You're looking at business strikes. There are no prices at 69 and 70 because there are none graded that high. Scroll down to get to the proof coins. image

    Russ, NCNE
  • Hi Russ,
    The proofs has only 1964 for PR69 and PR70, the rest of the years either CAM or DCAM.

    Does this mean there is no noticeable value if not CAM/DCAM?

    Thanks
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The proofs has only 1964 for PR69 and PR70, the rest of the years either CAM or DCAM. >>



    The 1964 also has CAM and DCAM for PR69 and lower. Not for PR70, though, since none have been graded that high with the designations.

    Edit: Now I realize what you're asking. You are correct. From 1968 on there is no value listed for the proof coins in simply brilliant because they are worth very little.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Thank you Russ,
    And Beau You don't need to subscribe to get the other prices.

    Thanks
  • JoshLJoshL Posts: 656 ✭✭
    Thanks

    I love coins...image
  • OneyOney Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭✭
    I have an additional question about the pricing guide. I have a registry set of proof roosevelt dimes 1950-64. I have several pop tops in the collection but the pricing guide does not price the tops on some but does the grade below. A good example, I have a 1961 PR70 dime, the price is $150 in PR69 with no price listed for PR70. I have a 1953 PR68. Same issue. Priced at PR67 but not PR68.

    Any information is greatly appreciated.

    Thanks in advance!
    Brian
Sign In or Register to comment.