Home U.S. Coin Forum

Photographing copper thru NGC plastic is like...

...watching HDTV through ¼ inch thick goggles. Obviously all slabs devalue the true look of a coin but there's something about the NGC plastic/white incert/copper combo that brings out the worst in a digital camera (and those trying to use it). The first pic was the best I could do after half an hour's worth of images, the second pic took about a minute after freeing the coin from its tomb. Sorry to use a darkside coin here but that's the only NGC copper I could experiment on.

Islemangu made a great point in a related forum post. If you image your coins and happen to be cracking a few out, take advantage of the opportunity. This also shows how you can't compare images of raw vs. certified coins.

image

Comments

  • GonfunkoGonfunko Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭
    WOW! That's incredible!
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Marty and I were just talking about this. The NGC plastic also obscures contrast for cameo coins making them more difficult to capture accurately. All slabs do the same thing, but to a lesser degree, so a raw shot is always going to be better.

    Here's another example in and out of the slab. In this case, PCGS:

    image

    image

    The first image took 20 to 25 shots before I had one I was happy with. The second image, two or three.

    Russ, NCNE
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Here's a comparison of the same coin in an NGC slab and a PCGS slab:

    image

    image

    Capturing the same coin took radically different lighting and angles simply based on the construction of the slab. It also took far more shots with the NGC slab than the PCGS slab.

    Russ, NCNE
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Good post. Thanks shylock and Russ for the great examples.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    Paul I hear you. I hate trying to image copper through a NGC slab. I was trying to do an Indian Head yesterday. This was the best I could do and the color is still not quite right. At least I was able to capture the luster. It ain't mine to crack out either so I had to settle.

    image
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    here's your first pic, tweaked a bit.

    image
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    A couple of my favorite copper pics are in NGC. Edited: raw is way easier.

    image
    image
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • jomjom Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I, again, reiterate my thinking that NGC really ought to change their slabs to a dark, non-reflective slab OR transparent like PCGS's. With the rise in Ebay sales for coins and on-line sales with coin dealers good images are increasingly important. So when an auction house has 100s of coins for sale do you really think they are going to take the time to get good slab photos from NGC graded coins? In most cases, no.

    jom
  • GonfunkoGonfunko Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I, again, reiterate my thinking that NGC really ought to change their slabs to a dark, non-reflective slab OR transparent like PCGS's. With the rise in Ebay sales for coins and on-line sales with coin dealers good images are increasingly important. So when an auction house has 100s of coins for sale do you really think they are going to take the time to get good slab photos from NGC graded coins? In most cases, no.

    jom >>


    But does NGC really want people to get good pictures of coins in their holders? After all, NGC has that Photo-Proof service whereby they take the picture for an extra $20 or so.....maybe they want more people to use it.
  • shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    Jom - Interesting idea that makes a lot of sense. The better their product looks in dealer's and auction house's listings, the better that reflects on them. The new vacuum sealed NGC slabs also tend to bulge out in the center, making them prone to scuff marks in that area.

    I'm sure some of the older collectors here roll their eyes at all the plastic nitpicking image
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    Paul, great post. It's not just the camera that's affected. Many coins look better to my eye out of the plastic. Cameo's are much brighter out of the holder. At best, the plastic is unobtrusive.
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,380 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Top raw, bottom slab......image

    image
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose.
  • jomjom Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>But does NGC really want people to get good pictures of coins in their holders? After all, NGC has that Photo-Proof service whereby they take the picture for an extra $20 or so.....maybe they want more people to use it. >>



    I don't buy the cynical arguement there. I think that photo proof thing will be a thing of the past eventually. What with the VERY low cost of doing your OWN photos. I just think it is in their best LONG TERM interest to go with a better slab for this purpose. Ever look at NGC coins at Heritage auction website? The pics are terrible....unless it is some high end coin they took the time to get a special photo for.

    jom

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file