Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Tiny Toner Test: cheapo scanner versus camera I'm still learning to use

Here's a 1901 copper Ceylon quarter-cent from Victoria's Victorian type set.

I still get better detail with the scanner, but the camera shows the toning. This was one Tough Teeny Toner Test for me, with my limited skills!

I'm still freehanding with the camera and fumbling quite a bit. But oh, what a difference, eh? And I'm only halfway there; I would say I am only 50-60% satisfied with the camera results on this, after about ten or twelve takes. The coin is far more beautiful and has plenty of other colors you don't see here, even in the camera pic!

Scanner:

image

Camera:

image

Scale:

image

The eBay seller of this coin used a scanner, I think, and his scan was smaller than mine. No wonder I "stole" this coin from him and was very pleasantly surprised when I got it. He had described it as a "nice BU with some red" but didn't mention the colors, as I recall. Needless to say, he got glowing feedback. After shipping and everything, I believe I have maybe ten bucks in this piece. Krause UNC price is $12 (for a generic UNC, which this definitely ain't), and Proof price is $100.

Now here's a question- do y'all suppose there is any chance this could be a proof? It certainly has the colors, and the fields are prooflike- there's a faint cameo contrast I was unable to capture in the pictures. Some light mirrors, too, but again, you can't really see them unless the coin is in hand and turned just so. It's such a small coin. There's a raised, wire rim, but I can't really tell if it's sharp enough to call the coin a proof. The strike is certainly very nice if it isn't.

Perhaps I should send it off for grading?

If you could see it in person, you'd have an inkling of why I think it might just maybe be a proof.


Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.