1891-CC, how would it grade? (larger pics added)
DesertRat
Posts: 1,791 ✭
I'm still learning and haven't looked at circulated Morgans for grading yet.
Sorry had the smaller pics first but fixed it.
Sorry had the smaller pics first but fixed it.
0
Comments
edited to add: Better pics. Thanks. I still say 35..about..
more likely f12/f15
<< <i>Maybe clw is right. May be only a Fine. VF20 on a really sunny day. >>
I was basing it on actual PCGS Morgans. I have an F12, F15, and VF20. It's not as good as my VF20. The obverse looks more worn than my F12, but the reverse might be a little better.
It could be the photos aren't picking up all the detail, or the grader who graded my "control sample" wasn't feeling generous that day. Thinking about it some more, however, I do think my VG10 guess was low. It's better than that. I hope it gets submitted so we'll found out someday.
Edited to add hastily snapped photos of my VF20 1892-CC
compared to your 20 clw.
reason why i say that is the slabbed coin looks cleaned and alittle un-natural where,DR`s ...well probably
cleaned as well, but doesnt have a new dipped look.
sorry no offense personally.
just interpreting the pics as i see them.
comes back pcgs VF20