1937d 3-leg

Vet

Comments on this buff,anyone.

JustMakesCents

You don't have a leg to stand on ...

Sorry, couldn't resist. Have nothing to add, not a buff person.

Jeff

JadeRareCoin

I need a closer look. Any chance at getting better images?

braddick

<< <i>I need a closer look. Any chance at getting better images? >>

What? You too lazy to step closer to your monitor?!

(Looks XF40 to me...)

JadeRareCoin

What? You too lazy to step closer to your monitor?!

Actually, I did step up to the monitor. We just went through some budget cuts and had all of our 17" monitors replaced with 4" black and white screens.

I just want a closer look for authentication purposes. Didn't even think about grading....yet.

EvilMCT

Ken

BigD5

Looks sharper than xf/40 to me. More like au/50, but the image is small. Can't tell if it's real from that image either.

Vet

I can try to get it bigger but my scan said it was 48 k . everytime Itry to post I get booted off. computers suck

Shamika

I agree with BigD. Looks AU50.

Veep

It looks genuine from the ragged rear leg and ragged back of the Indian's neck. I can't see if Unum is touching the bison's back. Nor, can I see the telltale trail of raised lumps leading from the belly to the ground. But, from what I can see it looks good.

I'd call it AU53-55 because I think that I'm detecting some remaining luster.

Vet

Thanks for all your comments.
Larry

au58

It's real. If the surfaces are good, it's at least EF 45. If the photos are a good representation, it's a very nice coin.

3Legs

I'd say xf45/au50 from the pics. Here's my PCGS AU53 for reference.