Opinions...

ddbird

What do you guys think this would grade in person?

Ebay Link

100proof1957

64-65 ?
maybe cleaned ?

tmot99

Looks high grade. But my question is that if it is actually a high grade, why isn't it slabbed? That's not to say that I am a big fan of slabs, but how many high grade morgans do you see raw?

CoinHunter2003

I don't know. 15 day return policy and he pretty much explains everything.
My thoughts are: it's a raw coin; do you want to take the risk?

ziggy29

Maybe the camera is playing tricks, but where's the luster? I don't see any signs of wear so I won't say AU-58, but...where's the luster? Maybe this one was dipped at one point, stripping it of most of its luster?

Even at the $47 opening bid, unless this one slabs as 65, it's not worth a bid. And unless the luster is much better than the picture shows, I don't think it gets more than 63-64.

TonedCoinTrader

I don't like that "Light Gold Toning" with the Lack of Luster. it looks like it was dipped to many times stripping luster and then toning a little.
My opinion Pass on this one.

Scott

ziggy29

<< <i>Looks high grade. But my question is that if it is actually a high grade, why isn't it slabbed? That's not to say that I am a big fan of slabs, but how many high grade morgans do you see raw? >>

For commons, I'd imagine there are still quite a few, especially if they won't make 65. Below MS-65 for commons, it's often not cost-effective to slab them. Maybe some 64s at the economy rate, but even that's pushing it. I'm sure there are still a fair number of MS-63 and -64 raw Morgans out there, particularly in the common dates. With a decent return policy from a seller you trust, that might make it worth taking a chance on them at potential "rip" prices...but not when you can get a slabbed 64 for not much more than that opening bid.

eagle7

If you read the item description, you will find that the term "high grade" simply means little or no wear. So the coin could actually be an au coin and meet his criteria. This is highlighted in the description.

merz2

Could that coin be a PL with toning ? I'd say at least MS64 could be MS65.

grip

Maybe whizzed and retoned?.It does have PL fields.
Al

beartracks42

My opinion---It is a 64/65 common Morgan.

Goober

64 to me. The lighting and angle is making the coin IMHO look better than it is. One good rim nick, and a nice ding off the throat. Plus, like I said, I believe the angle and lighting is hiding alot of the lighter marks.

nwcs

Typical 64

Shamika

64

ksteelheader

63/64

MICHAELDIXON

63 with a very bad picture.

catfish172

The return policy doesn't appeal to me. He says send it off for grading yet it must be returned in the original sealed flip to be eligible for a refund.
I do think it is a nice coin with overall eye appeal, but there are many dings and nicks in it.