Whatcha think?

ddbird

This just ended, I know its NTC *shudder*, and has kinda a weak strike, but fields look clean, and I think the color will be interesting. Open to all opinions...(NO I wont freak if you say its fugly). Overall, it was worth the $40 gamble to see!

LINK

Betta285

Aside from the weak strike it's a beautiful coin. I'm sure the colors are much more beautiful in person.

100proof1957

little dark for my taste's

ddbird

Thanks guys!

airplanenut

99% odds it's AT... doesn't look right at all.

kryptonitecomics

Very splotchy.......the back especially looks AT to me, but hey...I ain't no AT expert so you never know.

ddbird

ttt for the night crew

Louis

Classic AT.

ddbird

Well, Ill check it out in hand, they have a return policy so I am not too worried!

magikbilly

Hi,
it looks AT to me as well,

Best,
Billy

braddick

When you dip the AT off you're going to find muted, potted surfaces.

dan1ecu

I'll bet it looks better in person. AT... I don't know, but it's only $40!

ccex

Are you saying that the champion of the first round of PCGS "World Series of Grading" would intentionally hide behind another grading company's opinion and sell an AT coin at a "bargain" price? This eBay seller's name popped up here over a year ago (scroll down to #3 in the "statement" section) LINKY-POO Sorry if this is boring old news to some of you.

K6AZ

Suspicious toning, in that slab most likely overgraded by a point or two. Sorry.

Myqqy

I'm afraid that I don't like it either- the toning looks AT to me, and I'm guessing that the toning is covering up problems or poor luster.... if you were to ask my opinion, (and I know you didn't ) I would have advised you to spend your $40 on a quality 63 or 64 in a real holder- you'd probably like the coin more in the long term, and when it came time to resell, you'd get your money back....