Home› PSA Set Registry Forum

Question for 1967 collectors.

ZodiacMindwarpZodiacMindwarp Posts: 680 ✭✭
in PSA Set Registry Forum
I am going through my 1967s and I found a #26 Bob Priddy with no trade statement...at least I think it's a no trade statement. I have a #86 Mike McCormick which obviously had a trade statement and I assume it would be in the same place. The question is: Is this a variation that anyone cares about? Beckett has it listed at 7.5x its counterpart but I could not substantiate anything like that on eBay.

Any information would be appreciated.

Comments

  • dudedude Posts: 1,454 ✭✭
    Yes, both variations are sought after by collectors. I can't tell you the exact price, but I paid $45 for a raw Priddy rare variation that graded PSA 8 and I was quite satisfied with that price.
  • acowaacowa Posts: 945 ✭✭
    The No trade statements almost always command a premium. The easiest way to tell if the card has the trade statement is to compare the team name on the front with the team name on the back. I have found that quite a few are mislabelled by PSA so it's usually best to get a scan of the back of the card when buying these on EBAY.


    Regards,


    Alan
  • 1967topps1967topps Posts: 459 ✭✭
    a "no trade statement" would be something!

    Like "Hank was not traded to the Mets."

    or a late in the season card saying "The Padres never did move to Washington."

    Or, will the real George Korince please stand up?

    ebay:1967topps
    1967and 1973 Topps baseball wantlists (any condition) welcome. Once had the #14 ATF 1967 set. Yet another collector like skylaneflyer, gimel1 who made it to the completion of 1967 only to need the money more than the company of 609 close friends.
    Looking for oddball Norm Cash and Cleon Jones stuff, and 1956 team cards
Sign In or Register to comment.