Opinions on this toned Morgan?

davewang202

100% AT, but not wholly unattractive.

Dissenting/Concurring opinions?

anablep

Hi,
I like the reverse much more than the obverse, the toning is very "spotty."
Nice full strike, typical of an early S mint Morgan. Probably MS65 without the AT.

How's the luster?
Any chance of dipping then submitting it? I assume its raw or in a 3rd world holder...

fivecents

I concur it is AT, but I don't like the toning.

LanLord

The cheek looks very pitted, is that just the toning that makes it look that way, or is it really pitted?

davewang202

Raw.

Cheek is pitted for real, no hairlines, likely a legitimate MS63 under the toning.

The toning here is a bit too overboard, looks cartoonish (IMHO), but it is still interesting to me that silver can turn that color. So it's a keeper (for amusement values).

shmort6552

I think a tube of Bondo would fix up the obverse and all the reverse needs is a fresh coat of blue and it'll be a beauty!!

ccr

The obverse looks like it really could have naturally happen with the exception of the dark spot around the ear. The reverse is just plain nasty.

JeffinMich

Sorry, but it's nasty looking.

Stuart

Dave: It's not my type of natural looking high eye appeal coin.