worst designed cards
celesterussell
Posts: 354 ✭✭
1975 Bonds, Alex johnson, check out the airbrush.
all of 1960 BB, notice how they never used that format again.
1964 sadecki look for the "ass " of Top Brass" in the background.
1973 and that cheap paper that is boaderline embarassing.
And your right, the 67 set is the best of the decade,
1968 design so bad, they had to change in mid stream.
Rating best 1967, 1969, 1965, 1963, 1961, 1966, 1968, 1964, 1962, 1960 worst
all of 1960 BB, notice how they never used that format again.
1964 sadecki look for the "ass " of Top Brass" in the background.
1973 and that cheap paper that is boaderline embarassing.
And your right, the 67 set is the best of the decade,
1968 design so bad, they had to change in mid stream.
Rating best 1967, 1969, 1965, 1963, 1961, 1966, 1968, 1964, 1962, 1960 worst
In the USA all men are created equal but some are more equal than others....
0
Comments
Currently collecting.....your guess is as good as mine.
fleer i believe
1990 Fleer Football
1990 Topps FB
Anything Fleer Metal
Best:
1967 topps BB & FB
1963 topps FB
2004 Topps BB
Website
For old tobacco cards... I've never really been a fan of the T207's brown backgrounds...
Or those cards from the late 20's with the almost caricature drawings of guys like Cobb and Ruth...
<< <i>Those 87 Topps BB's kind of suck too with the wood bordering or whatever it is.
For old tobacco cards... I've never really been a fan of the T207's brown backgrounds...
Or those cards from the late 20's with the almost caricature drawings of guys like Cobb and Ruth... >>
Gues they tried to copy the 1962, 25 year anniversary? They just sucked. So ugly and incredibly overproduced. YUCK
1964 Topps Ray Sadecki
EDIT: I'm bidding on this one! Don't anyone dare outbid me!
1955 Bowman
1962 Topps
1987 Topps
Wood borders in general just make the cards look horrible.
<< <i>The ugliest cards are:
1955 Bowman
1962 Topps
1987 Topps
Wood borders in general just make the cards look horrible. >>
I like the '55 Bowmans because they are innovative with the TV set design. As for '62 and '87, the '62s were innovative, too, but the '87 was just a ripoff.
Vivid colors, neat horizontal design, some great ballpark shots, highlights of the '59 season - and the first complete set I ever collected.
I will join the majority opinion regarding 1990 Donruss, not to mention the crappy card stock of the early 80s Fleer and Donruss - yechhh!!!
"All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
1991 donruss
1990 donruss
87 topps may be cheesy, but the more i look at them, the more they grow on me. of course the first pack of cards i ever bought were 87 topps, so it may just be sentimental.
E
As to the worst, '82 Fleer is up there for me, mainly because of the photography. And some of those newer, garishly holographic sets like '95 Pacific Prisms. Where looking at them at the right angle under bright light can cause migraines or blindness.
Peter G.
however, 83 topps bb was a nice set and i thought it was an improvement over the 63 design .