Does pcgs feel that they are "at risk" when they give a top pop grade?
RegistryCoin
Posts: 5,117 ✭✭✭✭
Does the pcgs guarantee create a situation whereby pcgs' grading of a top pop begs for another, and perhaps another just to protect themselves from scrutiny concerning the original top pop?
0
Comments
If anything, the "risk" PCGS feels when awarding a coin with top pop status was probably addressed, as MS68 pointed out, by PCGS employing a "double verification process" recently - ensuring that these coins are solid specimens for the grade.
Wondercoin
Registrycoin,
I wouldn't necessarily "stand corrected". I agree with Brian, that in the area of copper (especially Lincolns, as the prices are so crazy) I think PCGS is certainly aware of the "risk" of grading a Pop 1 or 2 coin. These grades will be very difficult to come by, just MHO.
Jack
a profound increase in value. Under such circumstances, they seem to grade on
the ultra conservative side. Probably just as well for all concerned.
Camelot
Katrina
Jay: My coolest "70" gold specimens are the coins that are toning! They are awesome and the toning has -0- impact on the 70 grade IMHO. Let me know if you get any toned 70's in stock - I am a strong buyer - especially for PR70DCAM Gold Eagles which you mentioned.
Wondercoin
<< <i>I agree with Bear.
Katrina >>
Me too.
<< <i>It has seemed to me, that PCGS is extra diligent when an upgrade represents a profound increase in values. >>
Interesting, and the "agreements" are also interesting...
When did pcgs get "interested/knowledgable/into" deciding what creates a value increase? This is an interesting point.
Are we, as collectors, "giving in" to various independent grading services, or abiding an ostensible appraisal firm?