I give - Starting NGC Registry
badger
Posts: 1,217 ✭✭✭
I give up on crossing coins from NGC. 99% or the coins that I have submitted in the NGC holder (25+) have either not crossed or crossed at lower levels. I just got some back from grading today and I refreshed my memory of the coins in the NGC holders. These are super, eye appeal coins. I even let the grade level float but specified DCAM at any level. These didn't cross either. Some graded three levels lower (68=>65)???
I'm starting an NGC registry with the NGC and PCGS coins rather than continuing to try to cross these to PCGS. I will still keep a PCGS registry, but I feel that collecting coins instead of slabs will tend to shift my attention to the NGC registry.
I recognize that my PCGS coins are high in the grade compared to NGC. I don't want to cross these to NGC, but I am just tired of the game.
I'm starting an NGC registry with the NGC and PCGS coins rather than continuing to try to cross these to PCGS. I will still keep a PCGS registry, but I feel that collecting coins instead of slabs will tend to shift my attention to the NGC registry.
I recognize that my PCGS coins are high in the grade compared to NGC. I don't want to cross these to NGC, but I am just tired of the game.
Collector of Modern Silver Proofs 1950-1964 -- PCGS Registry as Elite Cameo
Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
0
Comments
Remove them before sending them.
Glen
I'm frustrated that I can't judge the coins for myself better.
I see solutions to both.
Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
I understand your frustration, and I will probably join you at NGC with some of my sets. It sounds like I've had better luck than you (and I do mean luck), but mine have been "nice" coins, not pop tops. As Glen said, there is a natural bias against any other company's slabs. All the incentives for the company are not to cross the coin. If it crosses, they get no more money. If it doesn't cross but should, then someone will submit it again, and again... Particularly if it should be a pop top.
Of course, it also is important to realize the grader probably spends less than a minute looking at the coin while you have spent many, many minutes studying it, or at least I do In most cases, I think the collector is "correct" for his/her chosen series. The collector has taken the time to find all the features of the coin while the grader must base their decision on only the indicators.
My two most disappointing cross attempts were a 1956 NGC 67UltraCam nickel and a 1957 PCI 70UltraCam nickel (for those who don't follow PCI closely, they assert that they use "UltraCam" for deeper cameos that DCams. The 1956 was as nice as the 1956 67DCam that I have in my set, but it did not cross in the holder even though I would have accepted 66DCam. I cracked out the 1957. It was nicer than two 1957 PCGS PR67Cameos that I have purchased and returned (one from DHRC, one from Teletrade), but my 1957 came back PR67 no cam. I'm still looking...
To lighten this up, my two best "crosses" were from PCI to PCGS and from PCGS to PCGS, both after breaking the coins out. The first is my 1956 PCGS 67DCam nickel. In its former life it was a PCI 69DCAM. Very, very few PCI dcam's will cross as dcam's, and many fewer as 67DCam's. The other is my 1954 PCGS 67DCam cent. I first knew it as a PCGS PR66 Cameo. Admittedly, NCS removed a little haze before I resubmitted it. This certainly is one of my favorite coins, in part because of this story.
Richard
MS Buffalo
MS 1951
I don't try to cross anything much anymore. My last attempt was to cross a 3 cent silver coin from ICG MS 63. I specified X and any grade. It came back PCGS MS 63 so I was happy with that.
-- PCGS has graded 19 coins MS67 (including FS), with none better
-- NGC has graded 220 coins MS67, with 2 better
Hmmmm...
You don't need to cross PCGS coins to NGC, as NGC will recognize the PCGS coins.