Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Nice Set Dude!

WOW, check out the new '68T baseball set -- georgous!

Your poor scanner must have been begging for mercy.

image
Dr S. of the Dead Donkeys MC

Comments

  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    Quite an entrance, Dan, Congratulations

    Here's the link for anyone that is interested.

    What are your goals for this set? Are you done - or will you upgrade? (if upgrade - just the 8s?) That is a beautiful set - thanks for all the pictures.
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • Wow - great scans. Congrats!
  • AknotAknot Posts: 1,196 ✭✭
    Wow. And I was thinking about just hyperlinking my scans from my website. That looks purty. (and I dont even like Baseball)
    image
  • rw2winrw2win Posts: 557
    VERY nice indeed! Thanks for the pics.
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭
    very nice dan! i may be off by 1 but the only hof ers that need an upgrade to a 9 is the ryan and mccovey but the rest are 9's and a 10 mantle!nice indeed.
    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • highendhighend Posts: 534
    awesome set! i spent the good part of an hour last night checking out the scans.

    dude - what kind of scanner do you use? mine is woefully inadequate.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Nice job Dan
    Good for you.
  • aconteaconte Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭
    Great job dude! You are a superfreak with that scanner. Very nice...

    aconte
  • dudedude Posts: 1,454 ✭✭
    Thanks guys for the nice feedback.

    To answer several questions, yes, I do plan on upgrading the set; mainly to find cards with the best eye appeal. I'd like to replace some 9's with superior 9's (better centering, fewer print spots, better focus, improved contrast, etc.), and maybe pick up a few 10's here and there if the price is right and of course try to replace most the 8's with better looking 9's. There are 4 HOF cards in PSA 8: Mays, Ryan, Perez and McCovey + a PSA 8 Rose.

    I collect this set as a kid in '68 and the cards survived all those spring cleanings, but none of the cards were decent condition, so I started rebuilding this set in raw form in 1990 and started getting cards graded in 1999. About half of the set on the Registry was submitted directly including many of the 10s. (I have the exact numbers on a spreadsheet at my office). The story behind how this set evolved is pretty amazing. I submitted over 3,000 - 1968 cards to PSA over the past 5 years, mostly from vending, and sold about 2,700 of them which enabled me generate enough money to put this set together at zero cost. The SMR for a PSA 9 set is $44,310. I've sold a bunch of 9's and 10's that were never replaced at the same grade, so that probably cost me about 0.05 on my GPA, but the market was hot and I have not regrets and who knows, I may still get most sometime soon in that original grade.

    My scanner is an HP 3970 that I bought earlier this year at Best Buy for under $100. It scans a lot faster than my old HP scanner and it also can be set to scan just the card(s) and not the entire length of the scanner bed, so the cycle time is pretty quick. It took me about 12 hours to scan the entire set and from one scan I generate 2 files per card: a ~500KB scan and an ~80KB scan for the Registry. I have the 500KB scans on CD and look at the set wherever there is a computer. The set looks totally awesome in the "SLIDESHOW" feature on Windows XP! Also, it took me 2 hours and 45 minutes to upload the cert numbers and scans on a T1 Network. The cert numbers were cut and pasted from an Excel spreadsheet. The Control & C keys on my keyboard are worn out!

    To me, when you've been fortunate to obtain something this nice, it's important to share what you've been blessed with and that's why I went to all that trouble to generate the scans for the Registry. Thanks again and enjoy!

  • Dude,
    I LOVE it!!! Out-freaking-standing!!! I've never liked '68s at all, but when they're as nice as yours they're great! Thanks for sharing all the images, it's a riot going through them and congrats again on all the work and compilation of a truly remarkable group of cards.


    dgf
  • Dan,

    Great job on the Set ... Thanks for all t he pix ... I wil be seeing burlap in my sleep tonight....
    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass... it's about learning to dance in the rain.
  • marzmarz Posts: 1,601
    I am jealous Dan. Why did I sell my starter PSA 9 set two years ago? I will be back after seeing this beauty. Your set is just Topps bro~


    BCDimage
    live each day like it's your last but don't count on it!
  • Awesome set Dan!!! I had a question, what is the image size in width, height, and units that you are using for the scans that are uploaded? My images are coming up to big when I preview them on 1024 x 768 screen resolution. Thanks and I hope I can get my scans to look this nice.

    TK
    1975 Topps Football PSA 9 or Better
  • dudedude Posts: 1,454 ✭✭
    Thanks again for the nice comments.

    Redman -- My HP Editing software (HP Photo and Imaging Gallery) is set for 90% JPEG compression with the picture size for the Registry is set at 3.3" x 2.0". I hope this helps.
Sign In or Register to comment.